8th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit sits in St. Louis Missouri. The Courthouse is the Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse. In addition to the Court of Appeals, the Eighth Circuit spans over 6-US states, including: Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and South Dakota. Although the Eighth Circuit originally had additional states situated in the geographic-region, Congress passed legislation which broke the Circuit into 2-separate circuits, which is known as the Tenth Circuit today.

The courthouses in each state are further broken down into regions. The Eastern District court in Arkansas sits in Little Rock and Western District court is in Fort Smith. The Northern District court in Iowa is in Cedar Rapids, and Southern District is in Des Moines, IA. The District of Minnesota court sits in Minneapolis, the Eastern District court is in St. Louis (Appeals court), and Western District is in Kansas City, MO. The District of Nebraska court sits in Omaha. The Northern District court in South Dakota is in Fargo, and Southern District court is in Sioux Falls, SD.

Currently there are 11 active judges on the bench in the Eighth Circuit and 7 senior judges. The Chief Justice is Lavenski Smith, and the Circuit Justice is Neil Gorsuch. A number of precedent-setting decisions have come from the Eighth District. Frosty Treats Inc. v Sony Computer Entertainment of America, Inc. (2005) is one of those cases. In the trademark case, the court held that Frosty Treats (largest US ice cream company) was not “distinctive” or “famous enough” to receive immunity protections from being used in a violent video game.

The National Law Review covers cases such as Frosty v Sony which deal with trademarks and branding, as well as several other categories and case law. Bankruptcy proceedings, tax related cases, government actions, indemnity cases, state actions, appointments, and State and Federal agency news. The National Law Review also covers the latest news pertaining to legislation, patents, election, and general-information in the legal community.

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Sep
5
2018
Responding to Consumer-Initiated Inquiry After "Cease" Letter Did Not Violate FDCPA, Eighth Circuit Court Holds Ballard Spahr LLP
Apr
24
2024
Relying on CAFA’s Discretionary “Home-State” Exception, Federal Court Punts Data Breach Class Action Back to State Court Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
11
2015
Reliance as an Element of Utmost Good Faith Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
17
2015
Release of Personal Information Called ‘Unlawful’ and a ‘Threat to Privacy’ in Eighth Circuit Appeals Brief Varnum LLP
Jan
17
2024
Reflecting on the Interplay Between Real Estate and Intellectual Property in 2023 - Landmark Trademark Cases and Copyright Conundrums ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
5
2017
Record-Setting Target Settlement Changes Expectations for Institutional Data Security Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Sep
24
2015
Recent Rulings May Spell Trouble for the Affordable Care Act Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
28
2012
Recent Case Emphasizes Importance of Fiduciary Decision-Making Process Poyner Spruill LLP
Dec
22
2020
Recall Roundup: November Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
21
2020
Race to the Top: Trademark Litigation in the Equine Industry Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Sep
13
2019
Qui Tam Defendants’ Presentations to Government During Investigation Unprotected from Discovery in Other Lawsuits, Federal District Court Ruled Tycko & Zavareei LLP
Mar
9
2015
Protective Order Issued in Suit to Stop EPA from Releasing Farmers’ Information Varnum LLP
Mar
26
2015
Protecting Trade Secrets Insufficient to Enforce Covenant Not to Compete in Any Capacity Worldwide McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
29
2013
Property Policy Covers Equipment in Temporary Storage Facility Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Apr
4
2014
Properly Analyzing Breach of a NDA (Non-disclosure Agreement): Loftness Specialized Farm Equip., Inc. v. Twiestmeyer McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
2
2021
Prop 12 Prevails over Constitutionality Complaints Keller and Heckman LLP
May
31
2022
Procedural Actions Following the Supreme Court Remand in Boechler Miller Canfield
Jul
12
2016
Prison Sentence for Responsible Corporate Actors Upheld Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
22
2014
Prior Protected Activity Did not Immunize Employee from Later Bad Acts Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
30
2021
Prescription Practices Called into Question: Iowa Court Applies Four-Factor Test to Physician’s Defamation Claim Based on Report to State Medical Board Polsinelli PC
May
28
2015
Preemption of State-Law Tort Claims by the Copyright Act McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
15
2015
Post-Employment Covenants: Is an Inducement to Smile An Inducement to Cancel? Mintz
Sep
11
2019
Pork Price-Fixing Complaint Dismissed: Class Plaintiffs Will Amend Bilzin Sumberg
Aug
27
2020
Ponzi Scheme Discovery Boom May Follow in the Wake of Worldwide Economic Contraction: Case Law Update and Key Takeaways for Defending Aiding and Abetting Claims Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jan
17
2019
Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Not Subject to the Any Willing Provider Laws in GA, MS, or NC, says Eighth Circuit Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
9
2019
Peterson v. UnitedHealth Group Inc. Challenges the Practice of Cross-Plan Offsetting Faegre Drinker
Feb
4
2019
Peterson v. United HealthCare decision illustrates limits on discretion of plan administrators’ when interpreting plan terms Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
May
3
2017
Persuader Rule Still in Limbo Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
6
2015
Performance You Can Measure Is Best Defense, FMLA Case Demonstrates Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
29
2022
PBM Regulatory Roundup (Spring 2022): The 8th Circuit Rules and More States Issue Regulations Mintz
Sep
28
2021
PBM Regulatory Landscape Roundup (Summer 2021): A Flurry of Regulations, Rutledge, and a Crucial 8th Circuit Decision Mintz
Dec
28
2015
Payment of Medicare Liens After Settlement of Wrongful Death Action Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C.
Aug
31
2015
Pay Attention to Those Doctor’s Notes re: FMLA Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
11
2016
Pay and Chase Insurer for Settlement? Better Get a Release Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jun
2
2013
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Decision on Likelihood of Confusion Not Entitled to Preclusive Effect in Infringment Action McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins