9th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, is the largest, with 29 judgeships presently hearing cases on the Bench. The Circuit was created out of the  Evarts Act of 1891, which initially established nine circuit court of appeals. Situated in the Western United States, the United States Court of Appeals is located in San Francisco, CA, at the James R. Browning US Court of Appeals Building.

There are nine states in the Ninth Circuit, and the District of Guam and District of Northern Mariana Islands also fall into the District’s jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals is in San Francisco. The District of Alaska courthouse is in Anchorage. The District of Arizona courthouse is in Phoenix. The Central District of California is in LA, Eastern District in Sacramento, and Southern District in San Diego, CA. The District of Guam courthouse is in Agana, and District of Hawaii is in Honolulu. The District of Idaho courthouse is in Boise, and District of Montana courthouse is in Billings. The District of Nevada courthouse is in Las Vegas, and District of Northern Mariana Islands courthouse in Saipan. The District of Oregon courthouse is in Portland. In the District of Washington, the Eastern District is in Spokane and Western District in Seattle, WA.

Being that it is the largest of the 13-circuits, the Ninth Circuit has 29 appointed judgeships currently sitting on the bench. This is alongside the 16 judges who are senior appointed judges. The Chief Judge for the circuit is Sidney Runyan Thomas, and the Circuit Justice is Anthony Kennedy, who is currently a US Supreme Court Justice.

Being the largest circuit in the country, several important decisions have come out of the Ninth Circuit. Mendez et. al v Westminister School District of Orange County, et al. (1947) is one of those cases. With the court sitting, en banc, the holding that Mexican-American students being placed in separate schools from those attended by a majority of the population was unconstitutional. In GlaxoSmithKline v Abbot Laboratories (2014) the court held that dismissal of jurors over sexual orientation would be barred in future cases.

The National Law Review covers similar cases as those detailed above and other types of case law. With Marijuana legalization being a hot-ticket item, several decisions have recently come in through the Ninth Circuit. Additionally, NLRB cases, employment rights, government elections and legislation, bankruptcy proceedings, and cases involving Major Corporations, have come through the Circuit. The National Law Review offers a wide range of cases in these categories, as well as news, appointments, and general information about the Ninth Circuit court system.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Oct
5
2017
Double Whammy: In a Sweeping New Opinion, the Ninth Circuit Creates a New Mechanism for Completely Wiping Out Unexpired Leases in Bankruptcy, and Also Undercuts a Critical Protection for Buyers in 363 Sales Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
22
2017
Correctional Officers FEHA Claims are Barred by Res Judicata for Already Adjudicated Workers’ Compensation Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
1
2018
Ninth Circuit Slams the Brakes on Nationwide Class Action Settlement; Choice of Law and Reliance Are Bumps in the Road Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
26
2018
Ninth Circuit Splits From Other Circuits, Holding That a Negligence Standard Applies to a Claim Challenging Tender Offer Disclosures Under Section 14(e) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
15
2018
Churchill Downs Seeks En Banc Review of Big Fish Decision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
21
2019
First Day on the Job and on Notice: When the Statute of Limitations Begins for Employer Background Checks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
31
2020
The Sixth Circuit Broadly Defines ATDS, Widening The Split Among Circuits Before The Supreme Court Rules Next Year Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
14
2020
Ixchel v. Biogen: California B2B Noncompetes Do Not Per Se Violate B&P Section 16600, and Are Instead Subject to Rule of Reason Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
11
2020
It’s Not Pop Secret, Ninth Circuit Affirms that Plaintiff Didn’t Have a Leg to Stand On Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2021
Reminder to Professional Services Firms – Do Not Take Your Trade Secrets for Granted Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
1
2023
Attorney Challenging First-Party Diminution of Value Claims Sanctioned by Ninth Circuit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
3
2024
Ninth Circuit Holds Loan Modification Made by Unlicensed Lender Violates State Usury Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
11
2013
Bankrupt Municipality May Reduce Retiree Benefits Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
2
2013
Federal Jury Finds Executive Recruiter Guilty Stealing Trade Secrets From Former Employer In Order to Start Competing Business Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2013
Ninth Circuit Falls In Line With Supreme Court Ruling on Class Action Removals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
14
2013
Major League Baseball’s Antitrust “Exemption” Is Immune From Judicial Overrule Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
19
2013
Plaintiffs Hit an Illinois Brick Wall: Indirect Purchasers of iPhone Apps Lack Standing to Bring Antitrust Suit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
12
2016
Compilation of Public Data Can be Trade Secret Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
16
2016
Consumers Are Unlikely to Confuse Yelp with Local Property Management Company Using Same Tagline in Ads, Court Rules Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
18
2017
Do Routine Calls by Health Plans to Patients and Health Plan Members Constitute “Telemarketing” Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act? Not Today! Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2017
Promoting Wellness, Not Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
26
2018
California Court of Appeal Affirms That Dynamex’s ABC Independent Contract Test Is Limited To Claims Arising Under Wage Orders Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
19
2019
Ninth Circuit and California Court of Appeals Rule on Freedom of Religion Rights Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
19
2021
The Ninth Circuit Puts the Brakes on Truckers’ California Meal and Rest Break Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2021
Trade Secret Litigants Take Note: California District Court Provides Guidance on Obtaining a Preliminary Injunction and Expedited Discovery Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2021
Insurers Owe No Coverage for COVID-19 Related Business Interruption Losses Under Commercial Property Policies Insuring “Direct Physical Loss of or Damage to Property” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
15
2023
New Insurance Law: The Extension of California’s “Genuine Dispute” Doctrine to Disputes Over the Value of General Damages In UM/UIM Claims Handling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
26
2023
Ninth Circuit Strikes Down Berkeley’s Ban on Natural Gas in New Construction, Dealing Blow to California’s Electrification Efforts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
16
2023
Supreme Court Weighs Whether to Clarify Camping Bans and Homelessness Policies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
3
2024
FTC Calls Out Bill Payment Company’s Use of Dark Pattern Practices Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
26
2010
It's Not Over For MGA's Bratz Doll Line Yet Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
19
2010
Ninth Circuit Holds That Scienter May Be Established Through An Objective Evaluation Of A Defendant's Deliberate Recklessness Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
27
2011
Ninth Circuit Rules That An Employee Who Quits Because The Business Is Closing Has Not "Voluntarily Departed" Under the WARN Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
3
2013
District Court Grants Motion to Compel Against Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), Holding that "Facts" Are Not Work Product In SEC Confidential Witness Interviews Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2013
Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners - Consumers Can Challenge Reebok's Exclusive NFL Apparel Deal Based Just on a Market of Garments Bearing NFL Team Logos Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins