D.C. Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is the Federal District Court in Washington, DC. The circuit is often referred to as “the District”, “Washington”, and often referred to by its initials, D.C., and is the capital of the United States.

The District of Columbia is governed by the US Constitution, which gives it the jurisdictional power to Congress, so it is not governed by any one state in the United States. The Federal District courthouse sits in the District of Columbia City Hall Building at Judiciary Square. The DC Court of Appeals and the  Superior Court of the District of Columbia make up the local court system in that district.

“The court of last resort” is often what the District of Columbia is referred to, as parties should try to have their cases settled in their respective state or circuit courts. The court has the authority to hear all final orders, specified interlocutory orders, judgments, and decisions which are made by certain government agencies in D.C. The Court is also permitted to hear cases which need to have cases which present questions of law presented by the Supreme Court heard. Given its power through Congress, the court is authorized to review proposed rules from trial courts and develop its own rules for proceedings which go through the court.

Currently there are eight associate judges and the circuit judge which are hearing cases which come through the District of Columbia circuit. At this level, judges are appointed to 15-year terms after being nominated by the President and appointed by the US Senate. Currently, the chief justice of the circuit is Anna Blackburne-Rigsby, who was initially appointed during the Clinton administration as an associate judge.

Unlike other circuits, the District of Columbia circuit issues MOJs, or memorandums of justice in cases where decisions do not result in new law. MOJs are also issued in cases where cases don’t decide on an important issue/federal question, or in cases which don’t interpret a statute or concept, which hasn’t yet been decided on. The court also publishes opinions in cases where both litigants and the trial court, create a new law, interpret statutes, or interpret important concepts in the legal system.

The National Law Review covers a broad range of MOJ findings as well as case opinions which are decided by the District of Columbia circuit. We cover: federal questions, retaliation claims, cybersecurity claims, Agency news, labor and employment, and other important federally driven cases. The National Law Review also focuses on appointments, and general news and elections , bankruptcy, tax cases, and other cases which go through the circuit’s system.   

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Jun
27
2012
No Damages Under FCA When Government Gets What It Pays For McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2023
No Copyright Protection for Works Created Solely by AI, DC Federal District Court Holds ArentFox Schiff LLP
May
16
2012
NLRB’s “Quickie” Election Rule Held Unenforceable (For Now) Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jul
30
2015
NLRB’s “Ambush Election” Rules Survive Federal Court Challenge Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
26
2016
NLRB’s New Joint-Employer Standard To Be Tested In Federal Court Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
28
2017
NLRB’s New Joint Employment Rules Fail . . . But Live to Fight Another Day Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
20
2017
NLRB’s New Joint Employer Standard Receives Chilly Reception During Court of Appeals Hearing Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
21
2024
NLRB’s Final Joint Employer Rule Takes Effect This Month Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
24
2017
NLRB’s Attempt To Incrementally Expand Weingarten Rights Rebuffed By Federal Appeals Court Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
9
2017
NLRB’s Acted More Like “Advocate Than Adjudicator” In Issuing Decision, DC Court of Appeals Concludes Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
11
2020
NLRB: Federal Court in DC Issues Promised Opinion on Election Regulations Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jun
2
2020
NLRB: Elements of Election Rule are Blocked by Court, But Board Implements the Rest Hunton Andrews Kurth
Apr
3
2024
NLRB'S Recent Move to Reduce Employers' Ability to Monitor Employee Productivity Struck Down Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
2
2012
NLRB's New "Quickie Election" Rule Struck Down...For Now Much Shelist, P.C.
May
17
2012
NLRB Union Election Rule Found Invalid Varnum LLP
Jul
1
2012
NLRB Told to Follow its Precedent or Explain Why Mintz
Jan
7
2015
NLRB Sued Over Quickie Election Rule Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
22
2012
NLRB Rulemaking Again Found Invalid by Federal Court Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
19
2017
NLRB Rolls Snake Eyes Before D.C. Circuit Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
13
2020
NLRB Prevails in Remaining Challenges to Election Regulations Hunton Andrews Kurth
Dec
21
2022
NLRB Nixes Reopening Remedy after Remand from D.C. Circuit Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
8
2012
NLRB Hears Oral Argument in Noel Canning v. NLRB Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
19
2011
NLRB Grants Use of Company Email for Union Purposes Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
2
2011
NLRB finds Las Vegas casino violated labor law in prohibiting access to off-duty restaurant employees National Labor Relations Board
Apr
28
2018
NLRB Failed to Support Conclusion that Employee’s Disparaging Comments Were Protected, Not Disloyal Jackson Lewis P.C.
Apr
30
2012
NLRB Enjoined from Enforcing Notice-Posting Rule Pending Appeal Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jun
15
2012
NLRB Asks D.C. District Court to Reconsider Decision Invalidating “Ambush” Election Rules Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
3
2018
NLRB Asks D.C. Circuit to Revive Review of Joint Employer Standard Under BFI; Hy-Brand Decision Vacated Following NLRB Ethics Official’s Report Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
22
2018
NLRB Approves Unilateral Benefits Changes Consistent with Past Practice Polsinelli PC
Dec
23
2014
NLRB Announces New Standard for Exercising Jurisdiction Over Religiously Affiliated Colleges and Universities Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
13
2016
NLRB Again Deprives Employer of Benefit of Bargained-for Management Rights Clause Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Nov
26
2014
NLRB Advice Memo Follows Alan Ritchey on Discretionary Discipline, Despite Nullification by Noel Canning Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
10
2013
NHL To Defend Players’ Suit for Head Injuries Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jan
21
2021
New Year, New Rules: The District of Columbia’s New Ban on Non-Compete Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
4
2010
New Law Creates Right to “Pump in Private” for Breastfeeding Vedder Price
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins