D.C. Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is the Federal District Court in Washington, DC. The circuit is often referred to as “the District”, “Washington”, and often referred to by its initials, D.C., and is the capital of the United States.

The District of Columbia is governed by the US Constitution, which gives it the jurisdictional power to Congress, so it is not governed by any one state in the United States. The Federal District courthouse sits in the District of Columbia City Hall Building at Judiciary Square. The DC Court of Appeals and the  Superior Court of the District of Columbia make up the local court system in that district.

“The court of last resort” is often what the District of Columbia is referred to, as parties should try to have their cases settled in their respective state or circuit courts. The court has the authority to hear all final orders, specified interlocutory orders, judgments, and decisions which are made by certain government agencies in D.C. The Court is also permitted to hear cases which need to have cases which present questions of law presented by the Supreme Court heard. Given its power through Congress, the court is authorized to review proposed rules from trial courts and develop its own rules for proceedings which go through the court.

Currently there are eight associate judges and the circuit judge which are hearing cases which come through the District of Columbia circuit. At this level, judges are appointed to 15-year terms after being nominated by the President and appointed by the US Senate. Currently, the chief justice of the circuit is Anna Blackburne-Rigsby, who was initially appointed during the Clinton administration as an associate judge.

Unlike other circuits, the District of Columbia circuit issues MOJs, or memorandums of justice in cases where decisions do not result in new law. MOJs are also issued in cases where cases don’t decide on an important issue/federal question, or in cases which don’t interpret a statute or concept, which hasn’t yet been decided on. The court also publishes opinions in cases where both litigants and the trial court, create a new law, interpret statutes, or interpret important concepts in the legal system.

The National Law Review covers a broad range of MOJ findings as well as case opinions which are decided by the District of Columbia circuit. We cover: federal questions, retaliation claims, cybersecurity claims, Agency news, labor and employment, and other important federally driven cases. The National Law Review also focuses on appointments, and general news and elections , bankruptcy, tax cases, and other cases which go through the circuit’s system.   

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Apr
9
2020
PTAB Designates Two Opinions Precedential and One Opinion Informative, Further Clarifying the Scope of the Board’s Discretion under § 325(d) to Decline Institution McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
31
2023
Almost Paradise? No Authorship for AI “Creativity Machine” McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2023
Seeking Harmony: Supreme Court to Consider Retrospective Relief for Timely Copyright Claims Under Discovery Rule McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
Specificity Key in IPR Petitions McDermott Will & Emery
May
24
2016
D.C. Federal Court Strikes Down ACA Cost Sharing Reduction Payments McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2019
Georgetown University Defeats Retirement Plan Fee Litigation and “If a Cat Were a Dog, It Would Bark” McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
29
2022
McDermottPlus Check-Up: April 29, 2022 McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
2
2014
Federal Court Vacates 340B Rule Regarding Orphan Drugs McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
4
2014
Full D.C. Circuit to Rehear ACA Premium Tax Credit Case McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2017
In Calculating FCA Damages, Another Court Rejects Government Windfalls Based on Purportedly “Tainted Claims” McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2018
The Public’s Right to Know: American Society for Testing and Materials, et al. v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
7
2023
It’s a Taking: Copyright Deposit Requirement Violates Fifth Amendment McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
29
2012
Patent Applicants Can Submit New Evidence to District Court in Civil Actions McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
14
2016
Timing Is (Almost) Everything: FERC Implements D.C. Circuit Guidance on NEPA Review of Multiple Pipeline Construction Projects McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
3
2020
Not Your Grandfather’s Internet Royalties? DMCA Favorable Rates Might Apply to Internet Offerings McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
13
2014
Supreme Court to Decide Important Administrative Law Issue McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
3
2015
Post-DMA, Federal Court of Appeals Broadly Interprets Jurisdictional Limitations of Anti-Injunction Act McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
20
2015
D.C. Federal Court Rejects HHS Interpretation of 340B Program’s Orphan Drug Rule McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
18
2017
DC Circuit Court Rejects Challenge to OVDP Transition Rules (Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program) McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2011
Naked Licensing Defense Barred Where Licensee Previously Failed to Contest Trademark Validity McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
27
2012
No Damages Under FCA When Government Gets What It Pays For McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2014
D.C. Circuit Limits Discovery and Joinder for Downloading "Swarms": AF Holdings v. Does et al. McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2021
Supreme Court Update: United States v. Palomar-Santiago (No. 20-437), Guam v. United States (No. 20-382), San Antonio v. Hotels.com (No. 20-334) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Aug
31
2021
D.C. Circuit Court Along with Nine Other Circuit Courts Rules that USCIS Has Final Say in Visa Revocations Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Aug
26
2022
Netflix Sues Bridgerton Musical Creators for Copyright and Trademark Infringement Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Sep
8
2023
Copyright, AI and Artistic Expression: Grappling with a New Reality in the World of Artificial Intelligence Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Oct
9
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 9, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
26
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 26, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
19
2022
USCIS Releases Revised Forms I-589 and I-765 The National Law Review / The National Law Forum LLC
May
1
2020
Recent Cases May Help Alleviate Concerns for H-1B Employers Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Dec
26
2017
D.C. Circuit Rejects All Industry Challenges to OSHA’s New Silica Standards Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Mar
5
2019
2018 EEO-1 Filing Season Eve Brings a Surprise Data Collection Requirement Reinstatement Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
May
22
2020
Recent USCIS Settlement Offers Substantial Relief to H-1B Employers Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Sep
12
2017
Well, I Know a Little About Wellness Programs: Court Finds EEOC’s Incentive Limit Unsupported, Remands to Agency Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Mar
6
2019
Court Orders Surprise EEO-1 Pay Data Collection Requirement Reinstatement—But When? Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins