Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction

Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
(incl: International Trade (Customs), Federal Claims, Armed Forces, Federal Adm. Agencies & Boards, Immigration, Tax, Gov. Personnel Appeals, Patent , Trademark, Veterans Appeals, etc.)

Custom text Title Organization
Jun
20
2016
 Ubisoft, Inc. v. Uniloc USA, Inc. Denying Joinder With Terminated Proceeding and Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
Sep
20
2016
 UCB v. Yeda R&D Co. – No “Safe Harbor” for Unamended Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
16
2018
 UCB, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. – Can a Racemic Mixture be a “Lead Compound.” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
2
2013
 Ultramercial v. Hulu – Judge Rader Clips the Wings of the “Abstract Idea” Exception to Software Invention Eligibility Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
15
2015
 Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC, Granting Institution of IPR Over Arguments Regarding Improper Incorporation by Reference IPR2015-00636 Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2014
 Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00288 Faegre Drinker
Apr
19
2021
 Unauthenticated Source Code Found Inadmissible Finnegan
Oct
23
2014
 Uncertain Times for Biotech and Pharma Patents Vedder Price
Dec
22
2017
 Unclaimed Features Cannot Save Eligibility of Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
22
2024
 Uncle Sam Can March In: Government Licenses Under Bayh-Dole Aren’t Subject to “Strict Timing Requirements” McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
25
2024
 Unclean Hands Aren’t Just for Toddlers McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2019
 Unconstitutionality of PTAB Judges Corrected by Federal Circuit Decision K&L Gates
May
12
2016
 Under Armour v. Adidas AG: Motion for Routine Discovery Granted as to Deposition Transcripts Referred to by Declarants IPR2015-00698, IPR2015-00700 Faegre Drinker
May
16
2019
 Under New Guidance: Patent Eligibility of Computerized Diagnostics at the PTAB Mintz
Oct
12
2011
 Underlying Invention and Not Category Literally Invoked by Claim Determines Subject Matter Eligibility McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
17
2019
 Understanding Antedating of a Prior Art Reference for a Patent Mintz
Mar
19
2015
 Understanding Post-AIA Power of Attorney Procedures --America Invents Act Mintz
Nov
27
2018
 Understanding Priority Claims for U.S. Patent Applications: Part 2 Mintz
Mar
9
2018
 Understanding The “Twice Rejected” Rule For Initiating An Appeal With The Patent Trial And Appeal Board Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
31
2016
 Unenforceability Due to Client Failure to Correct Counsel’s Misrepresentations to PTO McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
22
2015
 Unfortunately, Offensive Racial Comments Don’t Always Get You Fired (At Least Under Labor Law) Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
31
2016
 Unified Patents Inc. v. American Vehicular Sciences LLC - Motion for Additional Discovery Authorized IPR2016-00364 Faegre Drinker
Feb
24
2015
 Unified Patents Inc. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01252 Faegre Drinker
Mar
19
2015
 Unified Patents Inc. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC: Granting Motions to Seal IPR2014-01252 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2016
 Unified Patents v. BlitzSafe Texas: To Redact Entire Exhibit Board Expects Specific Discussion Of Why Each Subpart Is Confidential IPR2016-00118 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
 Unified Patents v. Dragon Intellectual Property: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01252 Faegre Drinker
Jan
11
2016
 Unified Patents v. Olivistar: Decision Denying Institution Where Every Element Of Challenged Claims Not Identified In Prior Art IPR2015-01217 Faegre Drinker
Jun
20
2015
 Unified Patents v. Personalized Media Communications: Decision Denying Motion for Joinder IPR2015-00521 Faegre Drinker
Jan
31
2015
 Unified Patents, Inc. v. Broadband iTV, Inc.: Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-01222 Faegre Drinker
Jul
30
2014
 Unified Patents, Inc. v. Personal Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC, Denying Motion for Joinder Faegre Drinker
Feb
16
2015
 Unified Patents’ Institution Decision Gives Insight to PTAB’s Real Party in Interest Analysis Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
12
2014
 Unilever, Inc. dba Unilever v. The Procter & Gamble Company: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00506 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2017
 Union Body Count and Big Spending Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
20
2015
 Union Represented Employee Not Entitled To Co-Worker Witness During Investigatory Interview, NLRB Rules Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
30
2019
 Unique Procedural Posture Leads to No Sanctions in Frivolous Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
3
2012
 United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Decision Rejects Associational Discrimination Claims under Chapter 151B Mintz
May
2
2014
 United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Introduces Glossary Pilot Program McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2013
 United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Issues First Decision Instituting Covered Business Method Patent Review (CBM) Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
27
2014
 United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) s.101 Guidelines – How to “Eviscerate Patent Law” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
31
2012
 United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board: “Just Say No to ‘CRACKBERRY’” McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
7
2010
 United States Weighs in on Myriad Genetics Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
4
2016
 Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics: Final Written Decision Concluding Nexus Not Established IPR2014-01102 Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2015
 Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Not Unpatentable IPR2014-01146 Faegre Drinker
Dec
3
2014
 Universal Remote Control, Inc. v. UEI Cayman, Inc. and Universal Electronics, Inc.: Order Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01111 Faegre Drinker
Jul
9
2014
 Universal Remote Control, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc., Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Nov
24
2017
 Unknown Problem Plus Nonobvious Solution Cannot Render Patent for Sublingual Formulation of Asenapine Obvious McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
13
2020
 Unlikely to Succeed: Preliminary Injunction Denied Despite Stipulation to Irreparable Harm McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2020
 Unnamed Respondent Has Standing to Seek Rescission of ITC General Exclusion Order McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
9
2023
 Unpredictability In The Art: Amgen v. Sanofi In View Of “Simultaneous Conception And Reduction To Practice” Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
23
2019
 Unrebutted Declaration Supports Public Availability of Prior Art McDermott Will & Emery
Subscribe to Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins