Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction

Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
(incl: International Trade (Customs), Federal Claims, Armed Forces, Federal Adm. Agencies & Boards, Immigration, Tax, Gov. Personnel Appeals, Patent , Trademark, Veterans Appeals, etc.)

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
16
2009
 TRANSAMERICA LIFE FOUND TO INFRINGE “BUSINESS METHOD PATENT” ON VARIABLE ANNUITIES Clark Hill PLC
Jun
14
2016
 Supreme Court Relaxes Standard for Enhancing Patent Damages in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
2
2010
 The Federal Circuit Holds That False Marking Plaintiff Has Standing to Sue in Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
6
2014
 Limelight Networks: There Has To Be A Bad Guy Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
25
2014
 Amending Patent Claims In AIA (America Invents Act) Trials: Difficult, But Not Impossible Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
11
2015
 Role of Previously Considered Prior Art in Deciding to Institute Inter Partes Review Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
5
2016
 Brazil: Update on Patentability of Diagnostic Claims (Part 2) Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
2
2017
 Federal Circuit Rules That Public Sales Trigger the AIA On-Sale Bar Even If Claimed Features Are Not Publicly Disclosed Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
18
2014
 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Cancels Six REDSKINS Trademark Registrations Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
15
2016
 In CellzDirect, the Federal Circuit Offers New Tools to Combat Patent Eligibility Challenges Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
30
2013
 Inter Partes Review May Provide a Process to Challenge the Validity of a Patent That Is More Economical and Efficient Than Patent Litigation Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
15
2015
 Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. – Another Diagnostic Patent Meets its End Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
7
2016
 Supreme Court Holds Profit from Components of Infringing Product Can Be Appropriate Measure of Design Patent Damages Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
3
2017
 Continuing Uncertainty in a Survey of IPR Estoppel Decisions under § 315(e)(2) Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
25
2017
 Federal Circuit Rejects District Court’s Invalidity Finding Based on Key Tenets of Non-Obviousness Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
17
2011
 Illinois Supreme Court Establishes A New Test To Determine Whether Non-Compete Agreements Are Enforceable Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
24
2014
 Lighting Ballast v. Philips – Federal Circuit Will Maintain De Novo Review of Claim Construction Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
10
2014
 Patent Co-Owner’s Refusal to Join Suit Defeats Standing to Sue for Patent Infringement Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
27
2017
 PTAB Holds That Sovereign Immunity Applies to IPR Proceedings and Is a Defense Available to State Entities Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
16
2017
 Federal Circuit Clarifies Boundaries of Discovery During Litigation Under the BPCIA Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
20
2014
 Antares Pharma Bolsters the “Original Patent” Rule for Reissued Patents Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
13
2015
 At the Board: Post Grant Proceedings at the PTAB Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
27
2017
 Federal Circuit Finds Inventor Testimony Inadequate to Establish A Common Inventive Entity Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
5
2017
 Federal Circuit Rejects PTAB’s Articulation of Obviousness Rationale, Disregard for Evidence, and Burden Shifting Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
4
2017
 Federal Circuit Applies 11th Amendment Immunity to Inventorship Claims Against State University Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
27
2017
 Federal Circuit Holds that the USPTO May Recover Attorneys’ Fees in Actions Under 35 U.S.C. § 145 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
19
2015
 It’s Status Quo for Now: Federal Circuit Denies Petition for Rehearing En Banc in Amgen v. Sandoz Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
31
2015
 An Update on Biosimilar Activity in the U.S. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
23
2015
 Federal Circuit Says USPTO Can’t Refuse Registration of Disparaging Trademarks Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
5
2017
 Supreme Court Rejects Federal Circuit’s Restrictive View of Patent Exhaustion Doctrine: Impression Products v. Lexmark Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
1
2015
 Inter Partes Review – 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) One Year Bar and Exceptions Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
2
2016
 U.S. Supreme Court Listens to Oral Arguments Regarding Claim Construction and Appellate Review of Institution Decisions in AIA Trials Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
12
2017
 Federal Circuit Reverses Eastern District of Texas Denial of Attorneys’ Fees Motion Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
8
2017
 PTAB Obviousness Determination Vacated and Remanded for Flawed Analysis of Unexpected Results Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
3
2015
 Update in Amgen v. Sandoz re: Biosimilar Applications Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Subscribe to Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins