Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
10
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 10, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
9
2014
Square, Inc. v. J. Carl Cooper: Order Denying Request for Rehearing of Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Grants in Part Request for Rehearing of its Decision on Live Testimony from Inventor Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
9
2014
Microsoft Corp. v. SurfCast, Inc. Order Granting Additional Briefing IPR2013-00292 Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 9, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
9
2014
Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Personal Audio, LLC, Decision: Denying Request for Reconsideration of Institution Decision IPR2014-00070 Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2014
Federal Circuit Finds that Public Interest Group Lacks Standing to Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decision Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
8
2014
How Should a Petitioner Address the Technological Invention Exemption in a Petition for Covered Business Method Review? Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
8
2014
What’s My Motivation? To Successfully Petition the PTAB, Experts Should Articulate Reasons for Combining References Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
7
2014
The U.S. Supreme Court Rules On Induced Infringement Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
6
2014
Providing Expert Testimony On Obviousness Is No Guarantee Of Having A Petition Granted Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
6
2014
Apple, Inc. v. Evolutionary Intelligence, Inc., Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery Faegre Drinker
Jun
6
2014
Supreme Court Delivers Unanimous Decisions in Two Important Patent Cases: What Do This Week’s Limelight and Nautilus Decisions Mean for You? Mintz
Jun
6
2014
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Statistics (2013 vs. May 2014) Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
6
2014
Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Federal Circuit Standards for Indefiniteness and Induced Infringement Katten
Jun
6
2014
Mastercard International Incorporated v. John D’Agostino: Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Stay Reexamination Faegre Drinker
Jun
6
2014
Limelight Networks: There Has To Be A Bad Guy Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
6
2014
PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) Delays Multiple CBM (Covered Business Method) Review Cases to Await SCOTUS Opinion in CLS Bank Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
6
2014
U.S. Supreme Court Makes It Easier to Knock Out Patents For Indefiniteness in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc. Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jun
6
2014
Denying Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing on Decision on Institutions: Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. The Procter & Gamble Company Faegre Drinker
Jun
6
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 6, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
5
2014
Department of Justice (DOJ) Revisits Music Royalty Consent Decrees Mintz
Jun
5
2014
Alcon Research Ltd v Dr. Joseph Neev: Denying Request for Rehearing of Denial of Institution Faegre Drinker
Jun
5
2014
(Don’t) Go West, Young Entrepreneur: Entrepreneurship in Wisconsin Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
5
2014
AcryliCon Accuses Silikal Of Trademark Infringement and Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
5
2014
Distinctive Developments, Ltd. v. Uniloc USA, Inc., Denying Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Reply Faegre Drinker
Jun
5
2014
GoerTek, Inc. and GoerTek Electronics, Inc. v. Knowles Electronics, LLC, Denying Request for Reheraing of Decision on Institution IPR2013-00523 Faegre Drinker
Jun
5
2014
Supreme Court Paves the Way for Invalidating Vague Patents Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins