Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Nov
14
2018
The Hammer Falls on the First Major Blockchain-based Art Auction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
6
2023
Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corp. 21-2296 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
19
2023
The After Effects of the Music Modernization Act in the Digital Streaming Sphere Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
29
2023
Design Patents Milestone Announced Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
20
2013
Hashtagging Away Your Rights: Privacy and Publicity Rights in Social Media Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
6
2023
SNIPR Tech. Ltd. v. Rockefeller Univ., No. 22-1260 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2016
Warren Distribution v. Royal Purple – What’s in a Name? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2023
Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., No. 2022-1387, 2022-1492 (Fed. Cir. Sept 1, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
13
2023
Federal Circuit Evaluates Impact of the Final Written Decision (FWD) in a Parallel Inter-Partes Review (IPR) on District Court’s decision of Invalidity and Infringement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
PTAB’s Authority to Issue a Final Written Decision After a Statutory Deadline Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2024
AI-Assisted Inventions: Are They Patentable? Who is the Inventor? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
7
2016
TTAB Precedential Decision: Time Limit for Adding Claims Is Tolled by Filing of Cancellation Within Registration’s Fifth Anniversary Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
29
2016
Parent Company Furnishes Cancellation of Subsidiary’s Trademark Registration Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
16
2016
Consumers Are Unlikely to Confuse Yelp with Local Property Management Company Using Same Tagline in Ads, Court Rules Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
11
2014
Amgen/Sandoz Disputes Will Clarify BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) Issues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
24
2017
100 Million Reasons For Open Source Compliance Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2021
Is Lawful Possession of a Trade Secret Enough for Standing to Sue for Misappropriation? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2021
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Denial of Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under CUTSA is Not an Appealable Order Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2009
Branded: Product Placement and Video Games Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2015
Those NDAs May Not Be Worth the Paper They Are Written On - Non-Disclosure Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
25
2010
Sublicenses By Exclusive Licensees Of Copyrights - Copyright "Clarification" May Change The Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
11
2011
The Ninth Circuit's Holding in Levi Strauss v. Abercrombie & Fitch - "Degree of Similarity" Is But One of Six TDRA Factors, Not the Threshold Test -- Marks An Important Decision Elucidating The Proper Dilution Standard Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2017
Deadline Approaching: Action Required by December 31 To Avoid Losing DMCA Safe Harbor Protection Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2018
UPDATE: The Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act vs. The California Uniform Trade Secrets Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
11
2023
Early 2023 Update: Where Are Plaintiffs Filing Patent Cases Now? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2023
Copyright Office Guidance on AI Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
13
2023
Copyright Office Artificial Intelligence Initiative and Resource Guide Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2023
Inguran, LLC, DBA STGenetics V. ABS Global, INC., Genius PLC, No. 2022-1385 (July 5, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins