Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Feb
26
2010
The Southern District Of New York Sends A Clear Message To Retailers Selling Counterfeits That Failing To Exercise Due Diligence In Purchasing Products After An Injunction May Result In Trebled Damages Of Millions Of Dollars Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
1
2010
Sometimes "Compare To" Packaging Means Just What it Says Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
17
2015
Venture Capitalists Running Scared – HBO's Hooli Suing Pied Piper Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
20
2022
Thinking of Jumping on the NFT Bandwagon – Are you Prepared? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
9
2012
The Year In Review Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2018
Patent Strategies for Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2023
Supreme Court Finds Warhol’s Commercial Licensing of “Orange Prince” to Vanity Fair Is Not Fair Use and Infringes Goldsmith’s Famed Rock Photo Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2013
Massachusetts District Court Finds No Inference of Conspiracy Arising From Members of Standard Setting Organization Pursuing Self Interest In Refusing To Approve Plaintiff's Competing Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
3
2013
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on "Pay for Delay" Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
14
2023
Healthier Choices Management Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. No. 22-1268 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
16
2023
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
21
2023
Generative AI and Patent Considerations – Part Two Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
21
2023
Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC No. 21-2320 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
10
2023
Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
19
2016
Copyright Is Nothing To Joke About Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
28
2023
Guarding the Name of the Game: The Role of Lawyers in Safeguarding Athlete Trademarks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2013
United States Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Two Cases That Could Potentially Deter Non-Practicing Entities From Filing Frivolous Suits Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Federal Circuit’s Determination on Whether Fraudulent Conduct in Obtaining Incontestable Status Warrants the Mark’s Cancellation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2016
Federal Circuit Won’t Review USPTO’s Alice Guidelines Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
22
2019
Don’t Wait Until There Is A Problem To Protect Your Trade Secrets November 2019 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2024
Highlights of Revised Regulations for Implementing Patent Law of China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2014
French Court Supports Freedom of Authentication: A Win for Art Experts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
4
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 3 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2020
3M Takes Action to Protect Its Brand from Price Gouging And Trademark Infringement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
23
2016
Virtual Porn – Real Patent Lawsuit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2020
Federal Circuit Confirms Addition of Two Inventors of Groundbreaking Immunotherapies for Cancer Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
15
2016
Don’t Lose Your Digital Millennium Copyright Act Safe Harbor Protection! Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
14
2020
Trade Secret Protection & the COVID-19 Cure: Observations on Federal Policy-Making & Potential Impact on Biomedical Advances Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins