Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort ascending
Mar
30
2016
Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.: Decision to Institute IPR Need Not Be Binary McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2019
Accessibility, not Access is Proper Legal Touchstone for § 102(B) McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2013
One-Year Time Limit for Inter Partes Review (IPR) Includes Counterclaims McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
18
2013
Court of Appeal Recasts Guidance on Granting Stays in Patent Proceedings While European Patent Office Proceedings Are Pending McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
2
2014
Proof of Conception of Invention Is Not Confined to Any Formula re: Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
29
2024
Consider Invention When Assessing Support for Claimed Range McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
7
2024
New PTO Guidance: Use KSR Flexible Approach to Obviousness McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
6
2019
New Arguments In IPR Reply Are Out Of The Frying Pan, Into The Fryer McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
29
2016
Advertisement and Subsidy Program Qualifies as Financial Product or Service Under Broad CBM Definition McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2024
New PTAB Claim Construction? Give the Parties Review Opportunity McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
3
2014
An Accused Device Is “Modified” by the Installation of Software McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
29
2016
Residency Definition in 28 USC § 1391(c) Still Controls IP Venue for § 1400(b) McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
4
2024
Take the Beer Goggles Off: Ambiguity Prevents Summary Judgment McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
13
2019
SCOTUS Rules PTO Not Entitled to Attorney’s Fees in Appeals to E.D. Virginia from Adverse PTAB Decisions McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
12
2014
European Commission Publishes Fourth Monitoring Report on Pharmaceutical Patent Settlements McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
18
2024
Virtually Done: Computer Visualization Patents Are Ineligible for Protection McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
25
2019
Cold Pattern Forecast: Piecemeal Design Evaluation Yields Improper Infringement Analysis McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
25
2024
Sole Searching: Trade Dress Hopes Booted as Functional, Nondistinctive McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2014
Covered Business Method Review Is All or Nothing Re: Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
May
17
2024
Supreme Court Permits Retrospective Relief for Timely Copyright Claims Under Discovery Rule McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
20
2020
All in the Family: Prior Patent License Implicitly Grants License to Asserted Patent McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
1
2014
No Foreseeability Bar to The Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents Re: Intellectual Property McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2020
Petitioner’s Reply Argument in IPR Is Not an Impermissible New Theory McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
4
2014
Properly Analyzing Breach of a NDA (Non-disclosure Agreement): Loftness Specialized Farm Equip., Inc. v. Twiestmeyer McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2014
Claim Preclusion Bars Second Lawsuit on Reexamined Claims Previously Held Invalid McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2016
No Waiver of Forum Selection Clause Despite Filing Declaratory Judgment Action in Non-Selected Forum McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2020
Rock Dust Dust-Up: Failure to Preserve Issues, Present Evidence at Trial Dooms Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
May
2
2014
Civil Contempt Only Applies if Party Violates Explicit Terms of Order McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins