Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Apr
28
2021
Employee Confidentiality Provisions: Overbreadth Can Lead to Under-Protection Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2009
What Is the Jurisdictional Pre-Requisite for Copyright Litigation?: Do Denim v. Fried Denim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2010
China's Supreme People's Court Publishes White Paper on Intellectual Property Protection by Chinese Courts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
15
2011
Patent Reform: Key Features of the Senate and House Bills Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
21
2011
About Face: Lancôme's Airbrushed Makeup Ads Banned in the UK Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
9
2022
Forum Selection Clause Can Preclude PTO Validity Challenges Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
12
2023
Protecting Semiconductor Chip Design under the Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984 (SCPA) – Part I (Registration and Inspection) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
30
2015
In re Allegiance Staffing – Rare “Any Other Established Fact” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
2
2013
Federal Jury Finds Executive Recruiter Guilty Stealing Trade Secrets From Former Employer In Order to Start Competing Business Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2013
An Unreasonable Royalty Rate is No Gaming Matter Re: Patent Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2019
Failure to Launch: Not Identifying the Proper Parties Can Prematurely End an Video Game IPR Challenge Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2019
Blockchain Games and Collectibles – Patents and Other Legal Issues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
19
2013
Chinese Acquisition of US Technology: Export Regulation and Foreign Investment Issue Spotting Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates PTAB’s Decision Based on an Overly Narrow Claim Construction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2024
The Importance of Reasonable Particularity in a Doctrine of Equivalents Argument Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
7
2020
AIPLA’s Updated Model Patent Jury Instructions Address “Clear and Convincing” Standard of Proof & Streamline Case Citations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
7
2014
Laches, Statutes of Limitations and Raging Bull: The Supreme Court Re-Emphasizes The Pitfalls of Delay In Copyright Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2020
Breach of FRAND Implications on ITC Exclusion Orders In View of the Public’s Interest Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2020
USPTO Announces a New Initiative to Provide Applicants Additional Time to Petition for Restoring a Right of Priority or Benefit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2021
Hello Again, Worlds: A Failed Gaming IPR Leads to § 101 Success Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2009
Employers Should Carefully Consider Whether To Sue Former Employees For Threatened Trade Secret Misappropriation Based On Recent California Court of Appeal Decision Awarding Over $1.6 Million To Former Employees Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
25
2010
California Court Takes On Trade-Secret Preemption of Other Civil Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2010
Gucci's Attempt to Extend Trademark Infringement Liability to Credit Card Merchant Service Providers Survives Motion to Dismiss Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2021
Reminder to Professional Services Firms – Do Not Take Your Trade Secrets for Granted Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
2
2015
Other Peoples’ (Adult) Content (Episode 15) of Silicon Valley Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
28
2022
Federal Circuit Deems Algorithm Potentially Valid Trade Secret Notwithstanding Prior Publication Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
4
2022
Dairy, LLC v. Milk Moovement, Inc.: Identifying Software Trade Secrets With Particularity to State a Claim for Trade Secret Misappropriation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
29
2015
August 2015 - Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins