Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
17
2014
SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Development Group, Inc., Denying Motion for Additional Discovery Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2014
Harmonic, Inc. v. Avid Technology, Inc., Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2014
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-11 of the ’143 Patent Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 16, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
16
2014
Examining Trends in Worldwide Design Intellectual Property Filings [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
16
2014
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Decision Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2014
Enzymotec Ltd. v. Neptune Technologies & Bioresources, Inc., Decision Granting Petitioner’s Motion For Joinder Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 4 of a 10-Part Series: Russia Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
16
2014
Conan Doyle’s Quixotic Attempt to Protect Sherlock Holmes Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
15
2014
Aftermath of the Supreme Court Ruling Regarding Patent-Ineligible Abstract Ideas in Alice v. CLS Bank Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
15
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 15, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
14
2014
VirtualAgility Inc. v. Salesforce.com: Federal Circuit Reverses District Court and Requires a Stay Pending a Patent Office Review of a Covered Business Method Patent Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
14
2014
International Safe Harbor Privacy Compliance: What You Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
14
2014
Seventh Circuit Rules on Trade Mark Abandonment Katten
Jul
14
2014
Todd Dickinson Resigns as Executive Director of AIPLA - American Intellectual Property Law Association Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
14
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 14, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
14
2014
USPTO Issues New (Software) Patent Examination Guidelines Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
Jul
14
2014
The Washington Redskins Lose Again, and Not on the Field Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
13
2014
Loral Space & Communications, Inc. v. Viasat, Inc.: Denying Rehearing and Expanded Panel Requests IPR2014-00236, 239, 240 Faegre Drinker
Jul
13
2014
Supreme Court Holds Computer-Implemented Invention Patent-Ineligible: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
13
2014
Prism Pharma Co., Ltd. v. Choongwae Pharma Corporation, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00315 Faegre Drinker
Jul
12
2014
ZTE Corp. and ZTE (USA) Inc. v. InterDigital Technology Corp.: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00275 Faegre Drinker
Jul
12
2014
Google Inc. and Twitter, Inc. v. EveryMD.com LLC, Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00347 Faegre Drinker
Jul
12
2014
Unilever, Inc. dba Unilever v. The Procter & Gamble Company: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00506 Faegre Drinker
Jul
11
2014
ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA), Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00133 Faegre Drinker
Jul
11
2014
IP Business Congress 2014 Interview [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
11
2014
Rackspace Hosting, Inc. v. Clouding IP, LLC, Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision on Institution CBM2014-00034 Faegre Drinker
Jul
11
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 11, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins