Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Mar
30
2021
Vanilla Flavoring Class Action Lawsuit Against McDonald’s Dismissed Keller and Heckman LLP
Feb
3
2016
New Jersey District Court Allows Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims to Proceed Despite Finding Subsequent Employer Did Not Induce Breach of Restrictive Covenants Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Apr
8
2016
A New Normal? Challenges to Market Definition Find a Foothold at 12(b)(6) Stage Proskauer Rose LLP
May
16
2017
Preparing for (or Avoiding) a Schoolyard Brawl: Rationalizing Patent Value Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
23
2017
Are You Breaking Up with Me? Termination Fees in Bankruptcy Called into Question. Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
9
2018
Nevada Supreme Court Accords Preclusive Effect To Subsequent Federal Court Order Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jan
30
2019
California District Court Sends Plaintiff Back to the Drawing Board to Clarify Which of Six Defendants Actually Called Him Faegre Drinker
Nov
15
2019
Reinsurance and the Death Master File Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
3
2015
California Federal Court Finds No “Road of Imprudence” or “Chasm of Equity” In Section 25501 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jan
25
2021
Wave of Class Action Lawsuits Alleging Deceptive Labeling of ‘Vanilla’ Products May be Coming to an End Keller and Heckman LLP
Nov
17
2015
Columbia Law Review Study of Fee Awards in Securities Class Actions Yields Surprising Results Mintz
Dec
29
2016
IPR One-Year Time Bar Does Not Apply to Government Contractor McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2017
Sovereign Immunity Can Shield State University Research Foundations in PTAB Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
26
2017
U.S. Tax Court Bounces Rev. Rul. 91-32: Sales of Partnership Interests by Foreign Partners May Not Be Subject to U.S. Tax Dickinson Wright PLLC
May
26
2022
Borrower/Lender Disagreements in PPP Loan Forgiveness Applications Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jan
22
2018
Can't This Just Be Over? Standing In Cybersecurity Claims Murtha Cullina
Nov
30
2022
Class Actions for Tuition Refunds Based on COVID-19 Pandemic Closure? Ohio Appeals Court Weighs In Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jun
12
2023
TIME TO TAKE ACTION?: As More and More Reports of Illegal Call Blocking Continue to Pour In, It Seems Like Litigation is Now Inevitable Troutman Amin, LLP
Aug
27
2019
Impact of Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Decision [VIDEO] Mintz
Aug
26
2020
LEAP Eligible Practitioners Try Their Hand at Oral Advocacy in LEAP Mock Arguments before the PTAB Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
23
2015
The Honorable Engagement Clause and Flexibility In Arbitration Award Relief Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
27
2020
The International State of Corruption: Why the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Continues to be the Most Successful Mechanism Available to Fight Corruption. Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto
Sep
30
2016
Federal Patent-Agent Privilege Not Recognized in Texas State Courts McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2022
SCOTUS Cert Recap: Immigration, Free Speech, And Veterans’ Benefits Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
15
2022
NY Federal Court Rules Insurer Must Cover Policyholder’s Landlords Under Lease Agreement’s Indemnity Provision Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
7
2023
Federal Court Strikes Down Amendments to Puerto Rico 2017 Employment Law Reform Jackson Lewis P.C.
Dec
21
2023
Expert Testimony Nice-to-Have, Not Must-Have in Insurance Claims Goulston & Storrs
Mar
18
2024
Public Officials Subject to Suits for Blocking Social Media Critics, “Safety Valve” Relief from Mandatory Minimums Is Limited - SCOTUS Today Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins