Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
May
18
2020
A Rubric for Design Patent Claim Construction to a “Tee” Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
23
2018
Successful Appeals of PTAB Decisions: In re Hodges Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
10
2017
Federal Circuit Finds IPR Petitioner Lacks Standing To Appeal Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
1
2023
Seventh Circuit Revives Franchise No-Poach Case, Holds Per Se Treatment Possible Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
21
2015
Decoding NLRB’s New Joint Employer Standard Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
27
2018
Case to Watch: Goldman v. Breitbart, involving embedded Tweets of Tom Brady recruiting Kevin Durant in the Hamptons Foley & Lardner LLP
May
16
2022
Watch The Fine Print: Ninth Circuit Majority Opinion Requires Heightened Standards for Reasonably Conspicuous Notice of Browsewrap Terms to Compel Arbitration Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
26
2016
Incomplete Restriction Requirement Stops Clock For Patent Term Adjustment Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
3
2019
What the United States Supreme Court Holding on EEOC Charges Really Means Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
24
2023
A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments: October 24, 2023 Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
11
2018
Seventh Circuit Explains the Standard for Certification of a Question of State Law Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
3
2015
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Relator’s Complaint Under Amended Public Disclosure Bar Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
7
2017
Will Avastin Biosimilar Patent Dance Go On? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
2
2019
Supreme Court May Give Brand Owners an Easier Path to Trademark Damages Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
25
2016
Patent Term Adjustment Versus Double Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
May
15
2018
Claim Construction Of An Enantiomeric Chemical Structure Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
18
2023
Enforcing Arbitration Delegation in the Ninth Circuit Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
31
2015
No Collateral Challenge Of Patent Application Revival Foley & Lardner LLP
May
29
2018
Federal Circuit Finds INOMax Mental Steps Obvious As Ineligible Printed Matter Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
27
2020
PTAB Must Give Parties A Chance To Respond To New Grounds Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
21
2015
An In-Depth Look At USPTO Patent Quality Problems Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
22
2018
Sixth Circuit Swan Creek Opinion Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
4
2016
Wisconsin Employers Targeted for Technical Violations Foley & Lardner LLP
May
12
2015
California Supreme Court Scrutinizes Reverse Payment ANDA Settlements Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
14
2016
Virginia Court Can't Review Policy Behind Patent Term Adjustment Statute Foley & Lardner LLP
May
19
2015
The Importance of Contracts for Joint Infringement in Patent Cases Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
23
2018
Wisconsin Court of Appeals Reinstates Tort Claims Against Operator of Firearms-Classifieds Website Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
3
2020
CBM Review: A Postmortem Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins