Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort ascending
Jan
27
2018
DOJ’s Blue Book Partially Unsealed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2014
Commercial Division Justices Oing and Scarpulla Participate In New Pilot Program Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
9
2019
It’s Perfectly Clear Once Again— NLRB Limits “Perfectly Clear” Successor Exception Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2020
Rolls-Royce Seeks to Resolve Circuit Split on Whether District Courts Can Order Discovery For Use in Private Arbitration Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2017
California Supreme Court Holds Rest Periods Must Be Free From Duties And Employer Control Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
9
2014
US v. Quality Stores, Inc.: Supreme Courts Finds Severance Payments Taxable Wages Under FICA - Federal Insurance Contributions Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
27
2019
Employers Must Provide Pay Data to EEOC by September 30 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
30
2019
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Individualized Arbitration Where Agreement Is Ambiguous on Issue of Class Arbitration Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2019
Converting an IPR Loss into a District Court Win Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
11
2015
Second Circuit Clarifies that Allegations of Direct Fraudulent Representations Are Not Necessary for Market Manipulation Claims Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
21
2017
U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Class Action Waiver Divide Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
23
2017
Construction Law: Picerne Construction Corp. v. Castellino Villas (Feb. 18, 2016, C071197) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
26
2022
NAD Brings False Advertising Claims Over Privacy Representations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
15
2020
Materiality Concerns For CARES Act Enforcement Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
2
2021
Sixth Circuit Affirms FCC Rule That Most In Kind Contributions Are Franchise Fees Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2015
On the Eve of Oral Arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in King v. Burwell: Obamacare in the Balance Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2023
In Re: Cellect, LLC No. 2022-1293 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
7
2015
California Supreme Court Announces New Test for CEQA “Unusual Circumstances” Exception Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
22
2014
The Eleventh Circuit Interprets Prior Express Consent Under The TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2016
He’s got 99 Problems, But a Breach Might NOT be One Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2023
Federal Jury: Trade Association and Real Estate Brokerages Conspired to Inflate Commissions, $1.8B in Damages to Plaintiffs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
16
2015
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Agency Interpretations Are Not Subject To Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking Requirement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
19
2018
Title VII In Transition? Texas Federal Court Rules That Anti-Discrimination Statute Protects Transgender Individuals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
13
2020
Maybe the FTC Can’t Take That to the Bank: The Supreme Court’s Decision in Liu v. SEC and Its Implications for the FTC’s Ability to Seek Equitable Monetary Relief Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
29
2016
“Beware Greeks Bearing Gifts”: FCA Enforcement Turning to Federal Grants? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2015
B&B Hardware v. Hargis – U.S. Supreme Court Declares TTAB Findings Can Have Preclusive Effect on Subsequent Federal Court Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. Nos. 2022-1532, 2022-1533, (Fed. Cir. August 7, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
16
2017
California Court of Appeal Affirms Validity of Hospital Meal Period Waivers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins