Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Aug
16
2018
Restoring America’s Leadership in Innovation Act of 2018 Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
26
2017
Supreme Court Rejects Tolling Argument for Nonnamed Class Members’ Section 11 Claims Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
26
2020
401(k) Fee Lawsuits: What Can a Plan Sponsor Do? Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
10
2015
USPTO Plans To Hike Patent Fees Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
4
2018
Defendant Communications with Members of a Class Action Suit: Toeing the Line Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
16
2015
Federal Circuit To Revisit On Sale Bar Triggered By Contract Manufacture Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
19
2018
Diagnostic Method Claims And Primer Tools Lack Patent- Eligibility Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
15
2023
Salt Water Disposal Well Leases Can Pose a Trap for the Unwary Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
29
2015
The Assignment of Visiting Federal Judges, and a Little Wisconsin Judicial History Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
21
2020
More Clarity on What Constitutes a Final, Appealable Order in Bankruptcy After Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
12
2016
Losing Competing Property Not Teaching Away Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
11
2017
401(k)/403(b) Loan Borrowers – Check Your Paystubs! Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
2
2017
Is Bullying Harassment? Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
19
2020
Supply Contract Update: Michigan Court of Appeals Affirms that a Requirements Contract Need Not Be Exclusive (Cadillac Rubber & Plastics, Inc. v. Tubular Metal Systems, LLC) Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
10
2017
Taking the Pulse of Ascertainability in the Ninth Circuit after Briseno v. ConAgra Foods, Inc Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
21
2023
BYOD to E-Discovery: What Happens When Employees “Scan” and Send Chats of Company Documents Using Their Phones? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
30
2023
Ninth Circuit: Additional Information on Back of Packaging can Defeat Deceptive Labelling Claim Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
12
2020
D.C. Circuit Sidesteps Bristol-Myers Personal Jurisdiction Defense in Class Action, but Seventh Circuit Rejects It Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
7
2019
New USPTO Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Seeks to Standardize Abstract Idea Analysis Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
27
2016
Supreme Court Implied False Certification Case Reargued to First Circuit Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
26
2019
District Court Invalidates Prolacta Milk Processing Claims Under 35 USC 101 Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
12
2016
Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments: SEC, CFTC, Amicus Brief, Verble v. Morgan Stanley Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
7
2023
CPRA Enforcement Delayed Until at Least March 29, 2024 Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
21
2016
Florida Banks Beware of Eleventh Circuit Decision Implications Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
13
2019
Court Dismisses Biosimilar Petitioner's IPR Appeal For Lack of Standing Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
17
2023
Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Suit Alleging that Franchisor Was a Joint Employer Foley & Lardner LLP
May
27
2015
Supreme Court Holds Good Faith Belief of Invalidity Not a Defense to Induced Infringement Claim Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
2
2019
Federal Circuit Finds Endo Method Of Treatment Claims Satisfy 35 USC 101 Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins