Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Oct
25
2013
Second Circuit Applies Morrison to Criminal Prosecution Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
21
2022
FTC: Provider of Business Credit Reports Engaged in Deceptive and Unfair Practices, Refunds Customers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
6
2013
Supreme Court Grants Limited Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2020
The Trump NLRB Finally Issues Its Much Awaited “Joint Employer” Rule Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
13
2011
Federal Judge Upholds DOJ's Expansive Application Of FCPA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2020
Seventh Circuit Adopts Narrow Definition of Autodialer Under The TCPA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
12
2011
California Court of Appeal Holds That State Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Securities Act Class Actions Unless the Action Is a "Covered Class Action" and Involves a "Covered Security" Under SLUSA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
18
2011
The GAO Holds It Possesses Jurisdiction Over Bid Protests of Civilian Agency Task and Delivery Order Awards Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2011
Generic Drug Manufacturers And Failure To Warn: What duty is there after Pliva v. Mensing? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
26
2022
Are You Ready for Web3.0 and the Legal Issues it Will Bring? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
29
2015
August 2015 - Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
23
2011
UnZIPped in New Jersey: Does Requesting a Customer’s Zip Code Violate State Law? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2014
Beginning to Close the POM Circle? – POM Wonderful and Drug Advertising: JHP Pharmaceuticals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
24
2020
Why, How and When Katz May “Trump” an Expired CBA When It Comes to Making Unilateral Changes — The Relationship Between MV Transportation and Raytheon Network Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
23
2021
LG Chem’s Win In $1 Billion Electric Vehicle Trade Secret Dispute Upheld by International Trade Commission Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
16
2016
Consumers Are Unlikely to Confuse Yelp with Local Property Management Company Using Same Tagline in Ads, Court Rules Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
12
2019
Second Circuit Holds That Issuer’s Alleged Statements Concerning Its Regulatory Compliance Efforts Do Not Constitute Material Misstatements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2018
Patent Strategies for Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
6
2015
Hundreds of Hospitals Will Pay Over $250 Million in Nationwide FCA Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2018
FCA Materiality: It’s One thing to Proclaim but It’s Another Thing to Prove Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2019
The New Suits of Havana: How Non-U.S. Companies May Soon Be Sued for Their Business in Cuba Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
8
2021
The New Normal? An Update On Commercial Division Operations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
15
2014
Clear Sailing Ahead For Class Counsel in California Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
12
2021
Federal Court Decides ACA “Sabotage” Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
9
2022
Void vs. Voidable: The Distinction That Can Make or Break a Tortious Interference Claim in Light of the Great Resignation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2014
No Proof Necessary: SCOTUS Rules Defendant’s Notice Of Removal Under CAFA Need Not Include Evidence of The Amount In Controversy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
24
2015
Ninth Circuit Severely Limits “Rogue Employee” Exception for Corporations in Securities Fraud Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2018
Escobar’s Demanding Materiality Standard Nixes $350 Million Verdict Against Florida Nursing Facility Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins