Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort ascending
May
23
2017
Supreme Court Changes Where Patent Lawsuits Can Be Filed Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
7
2015
Federal Circuit Hears Oral Arguments in Litigation involving the First U.S. Biosimilar Product Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
5
2017
Supreme Court Rejects Federal Circuit’s Restrictive View of Patent Exhaustion Doctrine: Impression Products v. Lexmark Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
14
2016
Supreme Court Relaxes Standard for Enhancing Patent Damages in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
5
2013
Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission Decision Highlights Divide with Seventh Circuit on Proving Disability Discrimination Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
9
2013
Recent Decisions involving Section 3(d) of the Indian Patents Act Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
11
2010
The Seventh Circuit Finds Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Internet Company Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
3
2011
U.S. Supreme Court Expands Scope Of Individuals Who Can Bring Retaliation Claims Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
24
2014
Déjà vu - FSMA Implementation Deadlines Set Once Again by Judicial Consent Decree - Food Safety Modernization Act Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
6
2015
Third Circuit Follows FCC’s Suit and Expands Definition of “Autodialer" Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
26
2012
In Affirming Pharmaceutical Reps’ Exempt Status, U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Defer to DOL Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
28
2014
Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Illinois Eavesdropping Law Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
2
2012
Federal CAFO Regulations Remove “Propose to Discharge” Permitting Requirement Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
6
2014
Limelight Networks: There Has To Be A Bad Guy Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
3
2013
EPA Issues Revised PM2.5 Ambient Air Quality Standards Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
22
2016
Supreme Court Agrees to Review the Appropriate Measure of Design Patent Damages Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
18
2016
Supreme Court Finds Statutory Violation Does Not Confer Standing Alone Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
15
2015
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. – Another Diagnostic Patent Meets its End Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
6
2013
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Attacks Post Offer Medical History Gathering Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
14
2015
New Patent Examination Guidance in Canada for Evaluating Medical Diagnostic Methods: Will Canada’s Application Be More Flexible than the U.S.? Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
25
2017
Federal Circuit Rejects District Court’s Invalidity Finding Based on Key Tenets of Non-Obviousness Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
28
2010
False Patent Marking – Case Law Update: Threshold “Standing” Inquiry Dooms False Marking Claims Asserted By Plaintiffs Who Do Not Allege a Concrete or Particularized Injury-In-Fact Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
1
2011
A Federal District Court Rules That The Qui Tam Provision of the False Marking Statute is Unconstitutional Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
19
2015
NLRB Punts Northwestern Election Case Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
22
2011
Dukes v. Wal-Mart: What the Supreme Court Decision Means for Employers Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
12
2012
Selling the Wisconsin Corporation — Good News for Directors Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
24
2014
Lighting Ballast v. Philips – Federal Circuit Will Maintain De Novo Review of Claim Construction Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
6
2015
Illinois Supreme Court Explains Rule on “Picking Off” Plaintiffs in Class Actions Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins