Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Mar
28
2022
When Does Cryptocurrency Mining Create a Taxable Event? IRS Does Not Clarify Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2022
California Labor Code Section 925: A Word of Caution for Out-of-State Employers of California Employees Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
1
2011
Recent Virginia Supreme Court Decision Marks a Steady Shift in the Law Governing Noncompete Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
24
2020
Why, How and When Katz May “Trump” an Expired CBA When It Comes to Making Unilateral Changes — The Relationship Between MV Transportation and Raytheon Network Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
23
2021
More on McGill: Ninth Circuit Affirms Order Enforcing Arbitration of Public Injunctive Relief Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
21
2019
Federal Circuit Weighs in on Patent Subject-Matter Eligibility of Dietary Supplements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
16
2014
Sandoz and Celltrion Decline the Invitation to Dance: Biosimilars Challenge the Applicability of the BPCIA’s Exchange Provisions Before Bringing Suit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
1
2018
Ninth Circuit Slams the Brakes on Nationwide Class Action Settlement; Choice of Law and Reliance Are Bumps in the Road Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2014
When 30 Days Just Isn’t Enough: The Ninth Circuit Rules that Defendants’ Right to Remove May Not be Limited to 30 Days Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
25
2015
Another Gambling Class Action Fails – Washington Federal Court Finds Social Casino Games Not Gambling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
30
2015
In re Allegiance Staffing – Rare “Any Other Established Fact” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2021
“Winning” Prosecution Arguments Can Invalidate Your Patent As Indefinite Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
16
2021
Diminution in Value As A Measure of Damages for Trade Secret Misappropriation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
12
2023
What Does Affirmative Action’s Death Knell Mean for Employers? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2021
Statutory Offer To Compromise Void Without Express Acceptance Provision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
11
2014
Tenth Circuit Looks Past “General Partnership” Labels in Agreements to Determine Whether Certain Investments Constitute “Securities” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2022
California Court of Appeal Clarifies that a Derivative Plaintiff Must Demonstrate Both “Contemporaneous” and “Continuous” Ownership to Maintain a Derivative Suit on Behalf of a Limited Liability Company Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
17
2019
Insurer’s Mistake in Treating Non-Resident Relative as an Insured Under UM Coverage Of Umbrella Policy Did Not Create Coverage by Estoppel Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
1
2019
Yes, UCANN! Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
10
2023
Iowa Joins Growing List to Offer Potential Safe Harbor for Companies with Security Programs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2017
Suing The United States Government For Patent Infringement And Defending Against A Claim Of Obviousness Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2022
Time Is Not Always Money: Ninth Circuit Holds That Pre-Employment Drug Testing Is Not Compensable Under California Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
18
2014
Fourth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Securities Fraud Complaint Where Inference of Scienter Was Not Sufficiently Strong Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
6
2023
A Primer on When a Cause of Action Accrues for Statute of Limitations Purposes Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
11
2023
Recent Cyber-Related False Claims Act Activity Signals Contractors and Universities Should Examine Their Cybersecurity Practices and Brace for an Uptick in Enforcement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2023
Texas Court Strikes Down CFPB UDAAP Policy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
15
2017
You’re So Vague: Federal Circuit Sends IPR Decision Back to PTAB for More Thorough Analysis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
16
2017
Fourth Circuit Punts at Rare Opportunity to Rule on Statistical Sampling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins