Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort ascending
Mar
19
2018
Strategies In TCPA Defense Post ACA International Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jun
23
2021
Supreme Court: Schools Are Limited in Regulation of Off-Campus Speech Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
4
2015
Supreme Court Rules Medicaid Reimbursements Not Subject to Private Action by Providers Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
5
2015
Lessons for Employers from Ellen Pao v. Kleiner Perkins Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
5
2013
NCAA v. Christie: Administrative Law Point May Determine Future of Sports Betting Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
30
2016
Deadlocked Supreme Court Means Win for Public-Sector Unions Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
May
1
2013
Federal Appeals Court Reinstates EPA “Veto” Over Corps’ Mining-Related Permit Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
26
2016
Ohio Supreme Court Declines to Clarify Boundaries of Implied Warranty in Tort Claims Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Nov
4
2019
PTSD Compensation for First Responders without Associated Physical Injury Revisited by Ohio Legislature in New House Bill Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Feb
16
2023
Massachusetts Courts Clarify Standard for Spoliation of Evidence Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
31
2023
Trademark Rights In The Metaverse: Lessons Gleaned From The Hermes MetaBirkin Case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jun
1
2010
Ohio Supreme Court Holds Attorneys Fees Derived From Punitive Damage Award Are Insurable Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
5
2010
Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act Increases Potency of Qui Tam Suits Under the False Claims Act Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jan
31
2020
Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Fee Limitations for Third-Party Medical Records Requests Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
12
2011
Asbestos Litigation Case Questions Safety in the Workplace Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Oct
9
2015
Delaware Supreme Court rules that friendship and business relationships together are enough to challenge director’s independence Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
18
2012
Navigating Shareholder Litigation Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jun
7
2022
Oklahoma Adopts Mini Telephone Consumer Protection Act Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
The Seventh Circuit holds that 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(9) relating to securities class actions is an exception to CAFA jurisdiction, not a prerequisite Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
18
2019
NLRB Shifts Position on Successor Employers Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jun
4
2020
Publications Ohio House Passes Bill to Protect Health Care Providers from Civil Liability and Professional Disciplinary Actions Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
22
2015
West Virginia Adopts Comparative Fault: HB 2002 Abolishes Joint and Several Liability Standard Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Nov
28
2023
Martin Scorsese’s ‘Raging Bull’ and Flo Rida’s Common Link? Attention of the U.S. Supreme Court on the Relevant Damages Period for Copyright Infringement Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
4
2017
Supreme Court Rules Decisions on EEOC Subpoenas Must Be Reviewed for Abuse of Discretion Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
5
2017
Seventh Circuit: Title VII Covers Sexual Orientation Discrimination Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Nov
2
2022
FTX Delisting Highlights Howey Risks Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
21
2016
Top of mind: Four eDiscovery Trends to Watch in 2016 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
May
12
2016
Don’t Be Cruel to a Heart That’s True: Private Equity Acquisition - Hartley v. Consol. Glass Holdings, Inc., C.A. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins