June 30, 2022

Volume XII, Number 181

Advertisement
Advertisement

June 29, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 28, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Date Title Organization
15
Aug
Third Circuit vacates order granting the defendant leave to appeal an order remanding a class action case to state court where post-remand the state court dismissed the case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
15
Aug
Federal district court in NY holds CAFA’s Home State Exception is not jurisdictional, and CAFA imposes no deadline for raising the exception when an action is originally filed in federal court Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
14
Aug
Eighth Circuit affirms denial of remand in a case where the plaintiff attempted to challenge the court’s CAFA jurisdiction based on an amended complaint filed after removal Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
14
Aug
Halftime Score: Artist 1; ’Bama 0 McDermott Will & Emery
14
Aug
Maximus Will Pay $50,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Lawsuit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
14
Aug
Ninth Circuit reverses a remand order where the district court erroneously refused to consider jurisdictional evidence submitted by the removing party Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
13
Aug
A Sticky Situation—Secondary Considerations Require NEXUS to the Claimed Invention McDermott Will & Emery
13
Aug
The Seventh Circuit holds that 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(9) relating to securities class actions is an exception to CAFA jurisdiction, not a prerequisite Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
13
Aug
The Eighth Circuit holds that stipulations filed contemporaneously with a complaint limiting damages to an amount below CAFA’s jurisdictional threshold may be used to defeat CAFA jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
13
Aug
“Clear and Convincing” Is the Standard for Obviousness No Matter What McDermott Will & Emery
12
Aug
Non-Consumer Confusion May Factor into “Likelihood of Confusion” Analysis McDermott Will & Emery
12
Aug
The Ninth Circuit Finds in a Recent Parens Patriae Action that the Case is 99 Persons Short of a Mass Action under CAFA Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
12
Aug
False Claims Act Case Questioning Quality of Laboratory Services Unsealed in New Mexico Mintz
12
Aug
Hotels as Leased Assets Greenberg Traurig, LLP
12
Aug
Posner to Apple/Motorola: No Damages, No Injunction, No Trial McDermott Will & Emery
12
Aug
House Subcommittee Weighs CAFA Successes and Opportunities Seven Years after the Legislation’s Enactment Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
11
Aug
An Arkansas District Court Holds That a Stipulation as to the Amount in Controversy Contained in the Body of the Complaint is Sufficient to Defeat CAFA Jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
11
Aug
Prior Art's Disclosure of a Preferred Embodiment Does Not “Teach Away” from Inferior Alternatives McDermott Will & Emery
10
Aug
The Seventh Circuit Examines CAFA Amount in Controversy Evidence under the Legally Impossible Standard Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
10
Aug
Tax Court Makes Significant Amendments to Privilege and Discovery Rules McDermott Will & Emery

Pages