Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization
Mar
26
2014
A (POM) Wonderful Result For Consumer Class Action Defendants Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
26
2014
Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split on Standing in Lanham Act False Advertising Cases Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
26
2014
Wish Atlanta Files Complaint To Make ContextLogic Wish For A Different Trademark Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
26
2014
Bowing to Pressure, Four Loko Stops Selling Caffeinated Alcohol Beverages and Restricts Marketing to Under 21-Year Olds Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
26
2014
Implementing a Counterfeit Enforcement Program [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
26
2014
Supreme Court Decides in Favor of IRS in Quality Stores: FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) Generally Applies to Severance Payments McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
26
2014
Crimea River: U.S. Rushes to Impose Sanctions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
26
2014
Ukraine and Russia: Report on Sanctions and Related Concerns Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
26
2014
China Cracking Down On Pharmaceutical Corruption Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2014
Ready for a Surprise? Re: Aluminum Goods Tax in China Faegre Drinker
Mar
25
2014
My Partner Left Me for the Government! Department of Justice’s First Opinion Procedure Release of 2014 Approves Buyout of Minority Shareholder-Turned-Government Official Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
25
2014
The “Top Ten” Things for a Supplier to Consider in Terminating a Distributor Dickinson Wright PLLC
Mar
24
2014
Wisconsin Legislators Pass Bill to Thwart “Patent Trolls” McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
23
2014
USPTO Guidance for Examiners Takes Expansive View of Myriad and Prometheus Decisions - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Mintz
Mar
22
2014
New Antitrust Suit Takes Aim at NCAA Model Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
21
2014
State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPO) Announces Graphical User Interface (GUI) Related Design Becomes Patentable Subject Matter as of May 1, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
21
2014
Amendments to Uniform Branch Office Registration Form Katten
Mar
21
2014
Trade Sanctions Imposed in Response to Events in Ukraine McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
21
2014
Update on Economic Sanctions Triggered in Reaction to the Crisis in Ukraine Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
21
2014
Who’s in Charge – Is the Board Responsible to Monitor Its Financial Advisor or Vice Versa? McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
21
2014
Department of State Fines Defense Manufacturer $20 Million for ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) iViolations Faegre Drinker
Mar
21
2014
Legal Measures Against Counterfeit and Piracy in the European Union and The Netherlands Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
20
2014
FTC (Federal Trade Commission) Targets Reporting of Licensing of Pharmaceutical Patents With Special Rules for Premerger Notification: What You Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
20
2014
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Recent Developments: March 3, 2014 - March 7, 2014 Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
19
2014
General Overview of Recent Bill Under Review by the Mexican Congress for New Federal Competition Law Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
19
2014
Divisional Practice in the BRICs and other Countries – Part 8 of a 9-Part Series: Europe Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
19
2014
Unauthorized Children’s In-App Purchases Round Two: Google Faces Class Action Mintz
Mar
19
2014
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms that Controller Buyouts Can be Reviewed under the Business Judgment Rule If They Are Conditioned Up Front on Dual Approval Safeguards Greenberg Traurig, LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins