Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization
May
16
2013
Auto Insurer Trade Groups Applaud the Introduction of the "Parts Act" as a Step Towards Greater Competition in the Collision Parts Replacement Industry and Reduced Insurer Costs Dickinson Wright PLLC
May
15
2013
Lightlab Imaging v. Axsun Technologies and Volcano Raymond Law Group LLC
May
14
2013
California Court of Appeal Allows Injunction Under Unfair Competition Law To Prevent Horizontal Competitor From Diverting Business Through Unlawful Means Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
10
2013
A First for Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND): Federal Court in Microsoft v. Motorola Sets FRAND Royalty Rates for Standard Essential Patents McDermott Will & Emery
May
10
2013
International Trade Commission Rules Lack of Domestic Industry Results in a Termination of Investigation Vedder Price
May
9
2013
Supreme Court Exhausts Copyright Owners' Rights in Gray Market Goods Dispute Vedder Price
May
9
2013
China Update Mintz
May
9
2013
When Are A Franchisor's Financial Performance Representations Actionable? Armstrong Teasdale
May
8
2013
$8 Million Penalty for Weak International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) Compliance: How the Price of Maintenance Beats the Cost of Repair Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2013
China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) Secession: What It Means For International Arbitration in China Greenberg Traurig, LLP
May
8
2013
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Gets Hot, Bothered on Iran and Cuba: How Economic Sanctions Work Today Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2013
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA): No Delay Mintz
May
8
2013
U.S. Sanctions Target Russian Corruption, Human Rights Violations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
7
2013
State Efforts to Restrict Health Insurer Use of “Most Favored Nation” Clauses in Provider Contracts Continue to Multiply Dickinson Wright PLLC
May
7
2013
New “Beast” Rules Lessen the Export Control Burden Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
6
2013
Food Defense Strategy Exchange Varnum LLP
May
6
2013
Western District of Washington Sets Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) Royalty Rates and Range for Standard-Essential Patents (SEPs) McDermott Will & Emery
May
6
2013
"Buy American" Compliance Tips Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
6
2013
North Carolina Legislature Passes Prohibition on MFNs (Most Favored Nations Clauses) in Health Care Contracts McDermott Will & Emery
May
6
2013
Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) New Chairwoman Ramirez Says Health Care Continues To Be Top Priority McDermott Will & Emery
May
5
2013
China Law Update - Week of May 1, 2013 Mintz
May
3
2013
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Updates Guidelines for Making Proper Disclosures in Digital Advertising McDermott Will & Emery
May
2
2013
Federal Jury Finds Executive Recruiter Guilty Stealing Trade Secrets From Former Employer In Order to Start Competing Business Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
2
2013
Can California Cap and Trade if Brussels Stumbles? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
1
2013
Fourth Circuit Rejects Post-Trial Preclusion Ruling in Paper Towel “Stuffing” Saga McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
28
2013
Natural Gas Companies Settle Antitrust Suit Stemming from Joint Bidding McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
27
2013
Watt’s New? Michigan Energy News Varnum LLP
Apr
26
2013
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Preclusive Effect of Non-Delaware Dismissals and Rejects Irrebuttable Presumption That a Derivative Plaintiff Who Fails to Conduct a Section 220 Inspection Is an Inadequate Representative Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins