Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Apr
6
2016
Trade Secrets Bill with Controversial Civil Seizure Provision Passes Senate Holland & Hart LLP
Feb
8
2016
OFAC Issues a Warning: High Risk International Trade Managers Must be Trained on Prohibited Facilitation Holland & Hart LLP
Jan
14
2017
OFAC Conditionally Lifts U.S. Embargo on Sudan, but Certain Sanctions Remain Holland & Hart LLP
Jun
2
2017
D.C. Circuit Affirms OFAC’s Broad Enforcement Authority, but Demands Increased Transparency in its Decision-Making Process Holland & Hart LLP
Oct
29
2015
New Mitigating Factor for OFAC Penalties Holland & Hart LLP
Sep
14
2016
POTUS Lifts Sanctions on the Ivory Coast and Provides Highly Unusual Preview of Upcoming Burmese Sanctions Removal Holland & Hart LLP
Feb
15
2017
Imminent Foreign Terrorist Organization Designation of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Holland & Hart LLP
Sep
21
2015
Iran Remains a Top Priority for Szubin Holland & Hart LLP
Oct
6
2015
Winners in the New Cuban Sanctions Program: Telecommunication and Internet Service Providers, Travelers, and Attorneys Holland & Hart LLP
Dec
29
2015
The Most Significant Sanctions Executive Order of 2015? The Answer May Surprise You Holland & Hart LLP
Mar
9
2016
OFAC Targets Knowing Violations by Foreign Companies Holland & Hart LLP
Aug
4
2017
Chinese National Faces Up to 20 Years in Prison for Attempting to Illegally Export Carbon Fiber to China Holland & Hart LLP
Jul
29
2017
ExxonMobil Challenges OFAC’s First Russia Sanctions Penalty Holland & Hart LLP
Aug
4
2017
Singaporean National Sentenced to 40 Months in Prison for Scheme Involving Illegal Exports to Iran Holland & Hart LLP
Jan
7
2016
OFAC Continues to Reveal Hizballah’s Global Reach Holland & Hart LLP
Mar
16
2016
OFAC Provides Cuba Access to U.S. Dollar Holland & Hart LLP
May
6
2016
U.S. Designations Targeting a Major Panamanian Money Laundering Organization Not Aided by the Panama Papers Leak Holland & Hart LLP
Oct
14
2016
United States Lifts Burma Sanctions Holland & Hart LLP
Sep
6
2015
Third Circuit Finds that the FTC Has Authority to Sue Companies for Inadequate Cybersecurity Practices as an "Unfair" Practice Holland & Hart LLP
Sep
11
2015
Broader Joint-Employer Test Leads to Teamsters Win At Browning-Ferris Holland & Hart LLP
Nov
17
2015
Enforcement Notes — Syrian Focus & The Long Memory and Long Arm of Federal Law Enforcement Holland & Hart LLP
Dec
31
2015
Boilerplate Cyber Sanctions Regulations Portend Coming Actions Holland & Hart LLP
Jan
21
2016
First OFAC Sanctions Penalty of 2016 Continues Clear Trend of Enforcement Prioritization Holland & Hart LLP
Nov
18
2015
ITC’s Authority to Bar Infringing Imports is Limited to Tangible Articles, Does Not Extend to Digital Data Holland & Hart LLP
Dec
8
2015
Unintended Consequences of Vigilant Compliance Brings Change to Burmese Sanctions Holland & Hart LLP
Dec
22
2015
OFAC Actions Against Russia Increase Certainty for Compliance Programs Holland & Hart LLP
Feb
9
2016
OFAC Announces Its First “50 Percent Rule” Penalty Holland & Hart LLP
Feb
2
2016
Continued International and Domestic Coordinated Focus on Money Laundering Holland & Hart LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins