Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Oct
6
2022
Foley Manufacturing Update: October 6, 2022 Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
7
2022
Tech M&A Outlook: What Types of Deals are Getting Done? Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
4
2018
New Exclusions Process Opens Up Potential Relief from Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariffs for Automotive Companies Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
24
2023
Let’s Make a Deal: The American Farm Bureau Federation “Right-to-Repair” Memorandum of Understanding Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
18
2018
New Section 301 Expanded Tariffs and Exclusions Process Bring Danger and Opportunities for U.S. Importers and Consumers Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
7
2023
DOJ Withdraws Policy Statements That Defined Limited Safe Harbor for Information Sharing Among Competitors Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
10
2018
DOJ and FTC Signal Shifts in Antitrust Enforcement of Essential Patent Disputes Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
6
2019
Antitrust Scrutiny of Technology Companies Continues to Expand Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
26
2023
Key Considerations for Founders Exploring M&A as an Exit Strategy Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
30
2023
FTC Proposes Sweeping Changes to Hart-Scott-Rodino Filing Requirements Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
16
2019
Do You Know What IMMEX Stands For? Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
10
2019
Antitrust Surprises from DOJ during the Trump Administration – Predicting the Consequences Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
8
2019
DOJ Announces Procurement Collusion Strike Force Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
12
2023
Implications of DOJ’s New Safe Harbor for Disclosing Misconduct Uncovered During M&A Transactions Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
15
2020
Incoterms® 2020: The Terms They Are A-Changin’ Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
9
2023
New Circuit Decisions Highlight When Individualized Damages Issues May Preclude Class Certification Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
4
2024
International Trade, Enforcement & Compliance Recent Developments Update (January 3, 2024) Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
2
2023
New Legislation Extends California Noncompete Ban to Agreements Signed Outside the Golden State and May Impose Notice Obligations that Apply Retroactively Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
17
2024
International Compliance and Risk-Mitigation Heat Map (2024 Update) Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
20
2015
European Auto Industry Posts Gains on Economic Growth, Weak Euro Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
26
2021
Mexico’s Role in the USMCA-Driven Consolidation of the North American Auto Industry Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
2
2015
FTC’s $1.2 Billion Disgorgement Settlement With Cephalon: Heightened Scrutiny of Hatch-Waxman Settlements Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
14
2021
Right to Repair and the Biden Competition EO – What Manufacturers Need to Know Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
8
2015
Pacific Rim Countries Reach Historic Agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, But Will Congress Approve It? Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
8
2021
FTC Announces First Step Towards Regulation of Employee Non-Competes Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
16
2016
Deadline Approaching for Prop 65 Compliance for Bisphenol A Foley & Lardner LLP
May
16
2022
Supplier Alert: Key Changes in Stellantis/FCA New Terms and Conditions Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
27
2016
False Advertising Liability for Affiliate Marketing Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins