Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Jun
26
2011
Ninth Circuit Rejects Consumer Antitrust Challenge To Cable Television Bundling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2011
Clarity Required: Iran Sanctions Convictions Reversed in U.S. v. Banki Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
20
2022
First-Ever Executive Order on CFIUS Highlights Biden’s National Security Priorities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2017
Our Cuba Sanctions Predictions: How Did We Do? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
5
2022
Federal Trade Commission Focused on Right to Repair Restrictions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
12
2022
FTC, DFPI Shut Down Mortgage Relief Operation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
14
2017
The United States Munitions List: When Guns Come Off of the ITAR Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
20
2017
Recent Merger Reflects Enhanced Need for Revenue Cycle Management Platforms Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
17
2017
News Flash: Kleptocrats Still Taking Bribe Money With One Hand and Laundering it With the Other Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
1
2023
Domestic Content Requirements of the Inflation Reduction Act: Basic Requirements, Qualification Analysis, and Lingering Questions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2023
Web Tracking Creates a Web of Data Privacy Risks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
10
2013
Delaware and California Courts Split as to Whether a Reverse Triangular Merger Results In an Assignment By Operation of Law, Creating Potential Pitfalls for Delaware and Other Foreign Corporations Located in California Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2018
Lurches, Leaps, Feints, and Flops: Movements Without Motion in Russian Sanctions Policy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
10
2023
FDIC Settles with Bank for Repeat RESPA Violations, Doubling Previous Fine Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2013
$8 Million Penalty for Weak International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) Compliance: How the Price of Maintenance Beats the Cost of Repair Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
8
2018
Chips on Their Shoulders: CFIUS Intervenes in Broadcom’s Hostile Takeover Bid for Qualcomm Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
26
2013
Mexico's Telecommunications' Reform Ready to be Signed by President Peña Nieto Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
11
2013
A Rising Voice on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Compliance: The Court Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
12
2018
Five Things You Must Know About Trade Wars Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
24
2023
FTC Examining Small Business Credit Reporting System Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2013
Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners - Consumers Can Challenge Reebok's Exclusive NFL Apparel Deal Based Just on a Market of Garments Bearing NFL Team Logos Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
3
2023
Tax Credits for Electric Vehicle Batteries Under the Inflation Reduction Act: Free Trade Agreement Edition Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2023
Reverse CFIUS Unveiled: Focus on China, Semiconductors, Artificial Intelligence, and Quantum Computing Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
4
2023
Pillars of Due Diligence Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
8
2014
ECR (Export Control Reform) Episode VIII: New Rules for the New Year Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
28
2014
Higher Filing Thresholds for HSR Act Premerger Notifications Effective February 24, 2014 (Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2014
Illinois District Court Dismisses Motorola’s Multi-Billion Dollar Antitrust Claims Based On LCD Overseas Purchases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
8
2023
AI Enforcement Update: FTC Authorizes Compulsory Process for AI Investigations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins