Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Dec
7
2022
Tech M&A Outlook: What Types of Deals are Getting Done? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
24
2023
Let’s Make a Deal: The American Farm Bureau Federation “Right-to-Repair” Memorandum of Understanding Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
7
2023
DOJ Withdraws Policy Statements That Defined Limited Safe Harbor for Information Sharing Among Competitors Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
26
2023
Key Considerations for Founders Exploring M&A as an Exit Strategy Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
30
2023
FTC Proposes Sweeping Changes to Hart-Scott-Rodino Filing Requirements Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
3
2019
IMMEX Highlights – Certificates of Transfer of Goods Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
12
2023
Implications of DOJ’s New Safe Harbor for Disclosing Misconduct Uncovered During M&A Transactions Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
9
2023
New Circuit Decisions Highlight When Individualized Damages Issues May Preclude Class Certification Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
27
2020
2020 Outlook for Automotive M&A: Will the Good Times Keep Rolling? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
4
2024
International Trade, Enforcement & Compliance Recent Developments Update (January 3, 2024) Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
13
2024
Introduction: What is Supply Chain Management? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
16
2021
Acquiring a New 401(k) Plan in an M&A Transaction… Now What? Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
25
2015
Acquisition of HERE – a Prime Example of How IP Can “Drive” Value Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
19
2015
FTC Case Against LabMD Dismissed Due to Lack of Harm Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
28
2021
Flipping Your Business into the United States: Meet the Delaware C Corporation Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
22
2022
Will There Ever Be Microchips? Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
21
2016
U.S. Manufacturing Continues as World Leader Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
10
2022
What is an Automotive Fiscal Deposit in Mexico? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
7
2022
Department of Justice’s Antitrust Priorities in Health Care Target Private Equity, Labor, and More Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
24
2017
Don’t Be Inconspicuous: Disclaiming the Implied Warranty of Merchantability Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
22
2022
Okay with Your Officer Serving on Another Company’s Board? The FTC May Not Be. Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
20
2022
Foley Automotive Update 20 December 2022 Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
5
2018
New Exclusions Process Gives Automotive Companies the Possibility of Exemption from Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariffs Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
10
2023
What’s Next for Startup Founders in 2023: Hold, Fold or Raise Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
15
2018
Automotive Companies Impacted by Expanded Section 301 Tariffs Given Possibility of Product-Specific Exclusions Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
31
2023
“If It’s Not Broken, Don’t Fix Break It”— The FTC Targets the Franchise Business Model Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
27
2023
New York State’s Non-Compete Ban Set to Reach Governor’s Desk Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
1
2023
Episode 27: Subsidy Arrangements Between Hospitals and Physician Practices: What You Should Know [Podcast] Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins