Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Jan
11
2024
Day 2 Notes from the 42nd Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2024
CJEU Decision Will Have Impact on Potential Fine Setting Under GDPR Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
9
2024
FTC Announces Settlement of Junk Fee Enforcement Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
20
2024
China Raises Turnover Threshold for Anti-Monopoly Filing in M&A Deals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
11
2014
Too Good To Be True: FTC’s Crackdown On L’Occitane’s Body Slimming Almond Extracts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
28
2024
E(U)xterritoriality of EU Sanctions: The No Russia Clause Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
30
2020
A Trade War on Two Fronts: U.S. Considers More Tariffs on European Goods Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
2
2020
High Risk of Second Requests in the Cannabis Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
14
2024
The Sky’s the Limit – Yet More Section 301 Tariffs on China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
5
2015
Add Importers to Those Facing Expanding Whistleblower Claims under the False Claims Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
24
2021
How a New Era in Antitrust Enforcement May Impact Government Contractors Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
5
2015
NLRB Weighs-In on Franchise Joint Employers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
14
2021
The European Commission Adopts a Proposal for a Regulation on Foreign Subsidies Distorting the Internal Market Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
10
2015
California Relaxes Its “Made in the U.S.A.” Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
20
2021
FTC Warns Digital Health Industry to Comply with its Breach Notification Rule Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
30
2021
Trends in Digital Health Funding and Transactions: A Tremendous Year So Far Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2015
Pricing Algorithms and the Digital “Smoke-Filled Room” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
6
2016
Serious Games Require Serious Attention to Marketing Statements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
30
2016
Maximum Civil Penalties for HSR Violations to Increase to $40,000 per Day Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
29
2022
The Government Contractor’s Guide to (Not) Doing Business with Russia Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
26
2016
Refusal to Sell Bulk-Size Packs, Without More, Is Not Price Discrimination – “Size is Not a Service” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
18
2010
Treatment of Accrued But Unused Vacation in Asset Deals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
18
2011
Extradited Foreign Executive Jailed for Obstructing DOJ Antitrust Investigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
11
2017
FTC Requires that iSpring’s “Built in USA” Claims Hold Water Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
24
2011
Antitrust Counterclaim in Patent Infringement Action Lacks Plausible Allegations of Competitive Injury Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
26
2011
ANDA Automatic Stay of FDA Approval Does Not Defeat Standing in Sham Litigation Antitrust Counterclaim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
16
2017
Antitrust Not Always Available in Competitor Disputes in the Healthcare Sector Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2017
Dancing On Their Own: California Supreme Court’s Decision in McGill v. Citibank, N.A. that Class Action Waivers Do Not Apply to Claims for Public Injunctive Relief under California’s Consumer Protection Laws Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins