Feb 24 2011 |
Aspartame Class Action Dismissal Affirmed on Statute of Limitations Grounds |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 29 2011 |
United States Supreme Court Reiterates Materiality Standard For Securities Fraud Claims Under Rule 10b-5 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 25 2011 |
The California Court of Appeal Again Chips Away at In re Tobacco II |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 18 2014 |
Ninth Circuit Rules That Twombly Standard of Specificity Applies to FLSA Pleadings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 21 2014 |
Mandatory Reporting of Foreign Direct Investments in the U.S. |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 1 2015 |
The Broader Problem: European Bank Creates an Easy Catch for the Long Arm of U.S. Jurisdiction |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 16 2015 |
California Court of Appeal Refuses to Enforce Forum Selection Clause Because Employer Would Not Stipulate to Apply California Law and Did Not Show that the Foreign State’s Legal Protections Were Equal to California’s |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 15 2022 |
California Court of Appeal Holds that a Corporation’s Direct Cause of Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty is Legal Rather than Equitable, Requiring a Trial by Jury |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 14 2023 |
Healthier Choices Management Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. No. 22-1268 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 9 2024 |
Bank Groups Sue to Overturn New Community Lending Rules |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 30 2009 |
California Passes New Electronic Discovery Act Effective Immediately |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 1 2010 |
Ninth Circuit Clarifies Rule 23 Class Certification Standard |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 11 2010 |
California Court Addresses "Stray Remarks Doctrine" In Employment Discrimination Cases |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 18 2010 |
No Private Right of Action for Violation of Statutes Extending Notice Period for Foreclosures |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 29 2011 |
A MATRIXX Revolution, Part II: Supreme Court affirms Ninth Circuit's holding that Life Science Companies Cannot Rely On a Statistical Significance Standard When Deciding Whether Adverse Event Reports are Material for the Purpose of Securities Disclosures |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 12 2011 |
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Relief a Shareholder is Entitled For Inspection of Corporate Books And Records Pursuant To A Section 220 Demand |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 7 2013 |
Art Law: Russian Revolution Redux - Seized Painting During Russian Revolution |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 19 2013 |
Massachusetts District Court Finds No Inference of Conspiracy Arising From Members of Standard Setting Organization Pursuing Self Interest In Refusing To Approve Plaintiff's Competing Technology |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 10 2014 |
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Report Targets Arbitration Clauses |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 25 2014 |
U.S. Supreme Court Decision Gives More Latitude to Defeat Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuits Prior to Class Certification |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 28 2014 |
Recent Developments in Cases Dealing with the False Claims Act’s First-to-File and Public Disclosure Bars |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 4 2015 |
Ascertainability Saps Plaintiffs’ Energy in Dietary Supplement Class Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 22 2020 |
Fifth Circuit Affirms Attorney’s Fee Award of $2.3 million in Misappropriation Case Against Former Employee who Failed to Comply with Court’s Objections Order |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 29 2021 |
“What’s In A Name?”: Federal Circuit Holds Claims Court Blurred Distinction Between ‘Size Protests’ And ‘Bid Protests’ In Dismissal For Failure To Exhaust Administrative Remedies |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 4 2023 |
New York Courts Continue to Assert Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Banks |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 30 2009 |
What Is the Jurisdictional Pre-Requisite for Copyright Litigation?: Do Denim v. Fried Denim |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 20 2010 |
Time Out: California Court of Appeal Enforces Statute of Limitations in Class Action Brought Under the UCL |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 12 2010 |
Under CERCLA, "Owner" Means Owner When Cleanup Costs Are Incurred, Not When Reimbursement Is Sought |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 10 2010 |
Second Circuit Holds That No Private Right Of Action Exists Under Section 304 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 28 2011 |
Delaware Supreme Court Holds That Chancery Court Is Not Bound By Merger Price Or Fairness Opinion In Appraisal Proceedings Under Delaware General Corporate Law Section 262(h) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 27 2011 |
Discover Bank Is Dead: The U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Federal Law Preempts State Laws That Obstruct The Enforcement Of Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 27 2011 |
Interlocutory Appeal From Denial Of Twombly Motion to Dismiss in Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 13 2011 |
California Court of Appeal Clarifies Breach of Warranty Law in Class Actions and Vacates Order Certifying Class of Consumers in American Honda Motor Company, Inc. v. Superior Court |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 25 2013 |
Museum Loans - Part Two Re: International Loans |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 21 2013 |
Supreme Court Continues To Expand Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Preemption |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |