Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Oct
22
2012
The USW Right to Work Case Clears First Hurdle Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
25
2013
Fine Particle Emissions Rules Remanded- Stricter Clean Air Regulations for Nonattainment Areas Will Follow Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
19
2013
Déjà vu All Over Again: Michigan Meets Another Roadblock in Effort to Limit Project Labor Agreements Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
12
2013
Unanimous Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Decision to Allow Class Arbitration Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
20
2014
Florida District Court Bolsters the Five-Year Statute of Limitations Defense to SEC Civil Enforcement Actions Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
19
2014
Second Circuit Defines “Customer” Under FINRA Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
29
2014
Simply Because You Have Been Sued Doesn't Mean That You Should Sue Back--At Least Not Immediately Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
7
2015
Ninth Circuit Court Shuts Down Goodyear’s Discovery Shell Game Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
16
2016
Effectively Managing Foreign Language Documents in Commercial Litigation: It’s All Greek to Me Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
8
2020
Third Circuit Schools District Court on Workplace Class Certification Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
19
2012
The Top 10 Ways To Reduce Discovery Costs: Nos. 10-6 Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
27
2013
The New Rules of the Delaware Court of Chancery: ESI (Electronically Stored Information), Form of Production, and Non-Party Subpoenas Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
3
2013
Seventh Circuit Deals Major Blow to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) New Source Review Enforcement Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
20
2014
D.C. District Court Order Provides a Warning About Attorney-Client Privilege Protection for Internal Investigations Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
27
2014
Social Media Discovery Increasingly Important in Commercial Litigation Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
24
2015
When is a Party Not a Party? Joint Litigants and Judicial Strikes in Minnesota Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
7
2015
Georgia Supreme Court Significantly Broadens Duty to Preserve Evidence Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
9
2017
Goldthrip v. Johnson & Johnson: Alter Ego Personal Jurisdiction Arguments Rejected Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
29
2020
Brain Freeze: California Federal Court Rejects Ice Cream Shop’s CAFA Removal Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
23
2012
EEOC Must Abide By 300-Day Rule in Pattern and Practice Case, Says New Jersey Federal Court Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
20
2013
Unanimous Supreme Court Slams Shut Procedural Loophole for Class-Action Plaintiffs Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
10
2013
Shift in Minnesota’s Law on Indemnification in Construction Contracts Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
23
2014
Patentees Bear Burden of Proving Infringement against Licensees Filing MedImmune Declaratory Judgment Lawsuits Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
10
2014
The Supreme Court Meant What It Said About the Finality of Judgments Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
8
2015
Supreme Court Passes on Chance to Apply Uniform Rules on After-Acquired Evidence Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
21
2015
Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Defendant Companies Can “Pick Off” Class Representatives With Full Settlement Offers Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
7
2015
Is “Ancient Documents” Hearsay Exception Going to be Ancient History in 2016 and What Impact Will it Have on Proving Missing Insurance Policies? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
14
2020
Recovering Attorney’s Fees Under Georgia Law Just Got Easier Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
29
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Federal Government Accountable for ACA Promises Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
14
2011
U.S. Supreme Court Stresses Importance of Commonality in Decertifying Massive Sex Discrimination Class of 1.5 Million Wal-Mart Employees Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
7
2013
NLRB Overturns 30-plus Years of Precedent Regarding “Witness Statements” - Labor & Employment Law Alert Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
27
2014
Harming a Company in the Forum State Does Not Constitute ‘Minimum Contacts’ for Personal Jurisdiction Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
30
2012
Rejecting Milward: A “Weight of the Evidence” Methodology is No Methodology At All Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
23
2013
Coast to Coast Noncompete Part 2: Still Going in 3 Courts in 2 States Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
21
2014
Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions: Who Speaks for the Company? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins