Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Oct
10
2013
Shift in Minnesota’s Law on Indemnification in Construction Contracts Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
23
2014
Patentees Bear Burden of Proving Infringement against Licensees Filing MedImmune Declaratory Judgment Lawsuits Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
10
2014
The Supreme Court Meant What It Said About the Finality of Judgments Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
8
2015
Supreme Court Passes on Chance to Apply Uniform Rules on After-Acquired Evidence Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
21
2015
Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Defendant Companies Can “Pick Off” Class Representatives With Full Settlement Offers Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
7
2015
Is “Ancient Documents” Hearsay Exception Going to be Ancient History in 2016 and What Impact Will it Have on Proving Missing Insurance Policies? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
14
2020
Recovering Attorney’s Fees Under Georgia Law Just Got Easier Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
29
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Federal Government Accountable for ACA Promises Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
14
2011
U.S. Supreme Court Stresses Importance of Commonality in Decertifying Massive Sex Discrimination Class of 1.5 Million Wal-Mart Employees Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
30
2012
Rejecting Milward: A “Weight of the Evidence” Methodology is No Methodology At All Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
7
2013
NLRB Overturns 30-plus Years of Precedent Regarding “Witness Statements” - Labor & Employment Law Alert Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
27
2014
Harming a Company in the Forum State Does Not Constitute ‘Minimum Contacts’ for Personal Jurisdiction Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
30
2012
Business Groups Join In Request For EEOC To Pay For Title VII Case Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
30
2012
Offers of Judgment Support Dismissal of Wage and Hour Claims Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
23
2013
Coast to Coast Noncompete Part 2: Still Going in 3 Courts in 2 States Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
21
2014
Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions: Who Speaks for the Company? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
27
2014
Using Summaries of Information Both Offensively and Defensively in Discovery Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
7
2022
DOJ Issues Expedited FCPA Opinion, Shows Willingness to Communicate With Requestors Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
4
2011
Class Actions Filed Over “Natural Food” Claims - Food, Drug & Device Law/Advertising & Marketing Alert Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
23
2011
Ninth Circuit Remands Board Decision Regarding Employee's Profanity-Laced Tirade Against Owner Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
11
2012
Immediate Action Needed: New Law Impacts Municipal Water and Sewer Utility Rates for Users Outside the Municipality’s Boundaries: Governmental Services Alert Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
19
2012
D.C. District Court Throws Out Ambush Election Rules, Finds Board Lacked Quorum Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
18
2013
U.S. Supreme Court Considers Heavy Class Action Caseload Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
10
2013
Seventh Circuit to Employers: Be Specific, Ambiguities in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 68 Offers of Judgment Might Cost You Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
9
2016
New York Court Finds Depositing Full Value of Plaintiff’s Claim Under Rule 67 Cannot Moot Plaintiff’s Class Action Claim Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
25
2016
Supreme Court Finds an Unaccepted Offer for Complete Relief Does Not Moot Individual or Class Claims, But Leaves the Door Ajar Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
26
2018
Federal Rule Changes Coming in December Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
15
2024
California High Court's PAGA Decision Curtails Manageability Defense Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
25
2011
Indiana Appeals Court Finds Appeal of Ordinance Violation Not Moot Even After Fine Is Paid Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
1
2012
Insurance Recovery and Counseling - Ninth Circuit Expands Duty to Settle Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
20
2012
Defendants File Motion to Dismiss in Indiana Right-to-Work Lawsuit Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
8
2012
California: Class Arbitration Prohibited if Not Authorized in Agreement Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
29
2012
Federal Court In Washington Rules That Allstate Sales Agent Is A Contractor, Not An Employee Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
3
2012
Southern District of Indiana Limits Scope of Discovery Sought From Former Employers for Whom Plaintiff May Obtain Re-Employment Pursuant to Union Working Agreement Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
27
2014
Warrant Required To Search Cell Phone? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins