Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
May
5
2013
No Directors, No Officers, No Employees And No Agents – Now What? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
May
3
2013
No Discovery Permitted in Inter Partes Reexamination Proceedings in Patent Claim Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
5
2022
NO DO-OVERS FOR YOU: District Court in North Carolina Denies Substitute Counsel’s Motion to Bifurcate Discovery Troutman Amin, LLP
Sep
22
2021
NO EVIDENCE PRECLUSION HERE: Court Allows Late Submission of Critical Evidence (But Isn’t Happy About It) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
18
2020
No Fishing Allowed: Discovery of Litigation Funding Requires Articulation of Relevance Beyond Speculation Mintz
Apr
17
2018
No Harm, No Foul: NJ Supreme Court Rejects No-Injury “Gotcha” Suits Under TCCWNA Faegre Drinker
Mar
3
2012
No Harm, No Foul: Supreme Court of Nevada Holds that Insurer Must Show Untimely Notice of Claim Caused Prejudice to Insurer Before Denying Coverage Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jun
10
2012
No Harm, No Foul? First Circuit Departs from Trend Narrowing Chapter 93A Injury Requirement, Reverses Dismissal of Claim Arising from Failed Price-Fixing Conspiracy Mintz
Jun
25
2021
No Harm, no Foul—With TransUnion v. Ramirez, the Supreme Court Holds that Fed. Rule Civ. P. 23 Does not Permit a Damages Class Where Much of the Class Suffered no Injury Nelson Mullins
Oct
7
2021
No Immunity: State Right of Publicity Law is § 230 “Law Pertaining to Intellectual Property” McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
11
2022
No Incentive Awards for Class Representatives — Eleventh Circuit Rejects Reconsideration En Banc of Its One-of-a-Kind Bar Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
5
2012
No Independent Analysis—No Preliminary Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2023
No Moore: Allstate Agent’s Regrettable Motion to Dismiss Denied in TCPA Suit And There’s a Lesson Here Troutman Amin, LLP
Sep
27
2013
No More Playing Cute With Non-Solicitation Obligations: First Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects "Customer Called Me First" Argument Mintz
Aug
23
2023
No Nationwide Class Action for Violation of the Bankruptcy Discharge Injunction Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Nov
25
2012
No Permanent Injunction if Plaintiff and Defendant Did Not Directly Compete; Ongoing Royalty to Be Applied Instead McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
20
2020
No Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Employees’ Claims to Certify FLSA Collective Action, Pennsylvania Court Rules Jackson Lewis P.C.
Dec
29
2016
No Place Like Home: Supreme Court to Review Whether § 1400(b) Alone Governs Venue in Patent Infringement Actions McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2013
No Preliminary Injunction Over Commercial Hopping McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
18
2010
No Private Right of Action for Violation of Statutes Extending Notice Period for Foreclosures Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2014
No Proof Necessary: SCOTUS Rules Defendant’s Notice Of Removal Under CAFA Need Not Include Evidence of The Amount In Controversy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
23
2013
No Relief Under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) Section 473 For Missed Filing Deadline In California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Challenge Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
13
2020
No Reprieve: New Title IX Regulations Take Effect as Scheduled Faegre Drinker
Feb
12
2024
No Retaliatory Intent Needed: SCOTUS Eases Requirements for SOX Whistleblower Claims Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Feb
1
2024
NO SECOND BITES: Allstate Avoids Second Certification Effort in TCPA Class Action Troutman Amin, LLP
Sep
2
2021
No Service, No Notice McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
10
2011
No Seventh Circuit Rehearing in Kraft ERISA "Excessive Fees" Case McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
23
2014
No Sovereign Immunity: Targeting University Patents in Inter Partes Review Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
3
2013
No Standing by Alleged True Copyright Owner in Music Infringement Case McDermott Will & Emery
May
12
2011
No Standing if Plaintiff’s Exclusive Rights Were Limited in Time McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2022
No Surprises Act’s Regulation Establishing QPA as Presumptive Payment Amount Vacated by District Court Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
5
2012
No Trademark Infringement Where Contractor Listed Manufacturer’s Product in Municipal Bid McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
2
2021
No Waiver of Arbitration Right and Arbitrability Determination for Arbitrator Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
29
2016
No Waiver of Forum Selection Clause Despite Filing Declaratory Judgment Action in Non-Selected Forum McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2022
NO “BACK DOOR”: Court Denies Class Counsel’s Efforts to Potentially Solicit Class Members via Notification of Appellate Rights Troutman Amin, LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins