Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
9
2010
Second Circuit Finds Personal Jurisdiction Over California Vendor Based on the Shipment of a Single Product Bearing Counterfeit Mark to Brand Owner’s Attorneys in New York Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
8
2010
Debt Collection Attorneys Liable Under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act for Mistakes of Law Poyner Spruill LLP
Sep
2
2010
The Federal Circuit Holds That False Marking Plaintiff Has Standing to Sue in Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
28
2010
False Patent Marking – Case Law Update: Threshold “Standing” Inquiry Dooms False Marking Claims Asserted By Plaintiffs Who Do Not Allege a Concrete or Particularized Injury-In-Fact Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
27
2010
Confession of Judgment in Illinois: A Deceptively Simple Remedy Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
27
2010
D.C. Circuit Vacates Proposed Fee For NYSE Arca "Depth-Of-Book" Data And Remands To SEC For Further Review Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
26
2010
Patent Precautions: Avoiding Errors in Inventorship Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
26
2010
Dead Zone? Direct Claims by Creditors of a California Corporation May Not Lie Against Management Based on Management's Allegedly Shifting Duties When Corporation Is in the Zone of Insolvency or Even Insolvent Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
25
2010
Jackson v. Tanfoglio Giuseppe S.R.L.: No Jurisdiction Over Non-Manufacturer Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
23
2010
Regulation by Litigation: Fourth Circuit Weighs in on Nuisance Suits Involving Air Emissions Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
22
2010
Wisconsin Supreme Court: “Follow Form” Provision May Trigger the Duty to Defend Under Indemnity Policies Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
21
2010
SCOTX aka Supreme Court of Texas: What I Did On My Summer Vacation Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
19
2010
Wisconsin Supreme Court: Settling Within Policy Limits Does Not Preclude a Bad Faith Claim Against Insurer Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
19
2010
Ninth Circuit Holds That Scienter May Be Established Through An Objective Evaluation Of A Defendant's Deliberate Recklessness Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
18
2010
The Seventh Circuit Rules That Electronic Confirmations of Internet Transactions Are Not Actionable Under FACTA Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
16
2010
Choice Healthcare v. Kaiser Foundation: Member Choices Don't Create Jurisdiction Over Health Insurer Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
14
2010
Three-Year Statute Of Limitations Applies To Inverse Condemnation Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
12
2010
Under CERCLA, "Owner" Means Owner When Cleanup Costs Are Incurred, Not When Reimbursement Is Sought Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2010
California Court Addresses "Stray Remarks Doctrine" In Employment Discrimination Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2010
Best Pleading Practices in Federal Court Following Twombly and Iqbal Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
10
2010
Solar Applications Engineering v.T.A. Operating: Worm Hole Discovered In SCOTX Offices Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
8
2010
California Court of Appeal Extends Wrongful Termination Cause of Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
5
2010
Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act Increases Potency of Qui Tam Suits Under the False Claims Act Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
5
2010
Ninth Circuit Finds Employment Agreement Ambiguous As To Whether An Employee's "Ideas" Were Assigned To Employer Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
2
2010
Washington Supreme Court Holds that State Statutes of Limitations Do Not Apply in Arbitration Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Aug
1
2010
United States Supreme Court Limits Extraterritorial Reach Of Private Federal Securities Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
31
2010
California Courts Affirm Additional Settlements Over Vigorous Objections Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
30
2010
Ninth Circuit Holds That Safe Harbor Provision Of The Reform Act Applies To Forward-Looking Statements Accompanied By Cautionary Language And Forward-Looking Statements Made Without Actual Knowledge Of Falsity Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
29
2010
Insurance Companies Beware: Recent West Virginia High Court Ruling May "Unleash a Flood of Lawsuits" Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jul
28
2010
What Contracting Parties Can Take Away from the Supreme Court’s Most Recent Arbitration Decisions Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jul
27
2010
California Endangered Species Act Prohibits State Agencies From Taking Threatened and Endangered Species Without Permit Authority Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
25
2010
Fraud Claim Against Syndicated Lender Allowed To Proceed, Despite Express Disclaimer Of Reliance In Deal Documents Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
21
2010
Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. Merrell: The Elephant In The Room Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
20
2010
Time Out: California Court of Appeal Enforces Statute of Limitations in Class Action Brought Under the UCL Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
20
2010
Willow Bend v. Downtown ABQ Partners: Tethering Personal Jurisdiction To The Substantive Law Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
19
2010
Conkright v. Frommert: Supreme Court Takes An ERISA Mulligan (Again) Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
18
2010
Notice Of Exemption Triggers A 35-Day Statute Of Limitations Under CEQA Despite Flaws in Underlying Approval Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
18
2010
United States District Court For The Southern District Of Texas Deprives Battlefield Contractors Of The Protections Of The Defense Base Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2010
Trustee's Establishment of Litigation Reserve Deemed Reasonable Under The "Prudent Man" Standard Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2010
Gucci's Attempt to Extend Trademark Infringement Liability to Credit Card Merchant Service Providers Survives Motion to Dismiss Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
14
2010
CA Court of Appeal Affirms Multi-Million Settlement Despite Vigorous Objections Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
14
2010
Be Careful What You Ask For: Costs of Issuing Broad Subpoena May Significantly Outweigh Benefits in NC Poyner Spruill LLP
Jul
14
2010
Equal Opportunity Harasser's use of female-specific slurs and remarks can support claim of hostile work environment. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jul
12
2010
DCAA Implements Federal Circuit Decision Requiring Interest Compounded Daily On Adjustments For CAS Noncompliances Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
11
2010
California Statute Regarding Convenience Checks Not Facially Preempted By Federal Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
11
2010
Supercenters Do Not Automatically Trigger Requirement To Study Urban Decay Effects In An EIR Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
8
2010
Labor Board Lacked Authority to Issue More Than 600 Decisions Vedder Price
Jul
6
2010
Bank Not Liable In Nigerian-Style Email Scam Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
4
2010
The California Court Of Appeal Narrowly Interprets The Perata Mortgage Relief Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
2
2010
Federal Courts Adopt a Liberal Pleading Standard for Erisa Plaintiffs Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 Cosgrove Law, L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins