Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Aug
22
2010
Wisconsin Supreme Court: “Follow Form” Provision May Trigger the Duty to Defend Under Indemnity Policies Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
29
2012
“The Next Asbestos” – False Advertising and Mislabeling Class Action Lawsuits Against the Agriculture, Food and Beverage Industry Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
6
2011
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Clarifies the Pleading Standard for False Patent Marking Claims Under 35 U.S.C. § 292 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
29
2011
Entrepreneur’s Guide to Litigation – Blog Series: Post-Trial and Execution on Judgment Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
24
2014
Lighting Ballast v. Philips – Federal Circuit Will Maintain De Novo Review of Claim Construction Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
18
2013
What are the Strategic Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Genesis Healthcare v. Symczyk? Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
15
2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: An Introduction Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
11
2015
Issuance of Discovery, Subpoenas and Process to Take Depositions in Wisconsin for Use in Other States is About to Change Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
27
2011
Entrepreneur’s Guide to Litigation – Blog Series: Discovery Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
24
2011
Wisconsin Supreme Court Limits WDNR’s Authority Regarding WPDES Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
21
2013
Establishment of Russia’s Specialized Intellectual Property Court Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
30
2014
Supreme Court Addresses Burden of Persuasion in Declaratory Judgment Action Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
18
2016
Supreme Court Finds Statutory Violation Does Not Confer Standing Alone Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
9
2012
A California District Court Holds that Defendant’s Proof of Amount in Controversy Falls Short of Both the Preponderance of the Evidence and the Legal Certainty Standards Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
15
2012
Third Circuit vacates order granting the defendant leave to appeal an order remanding a class action case to state court where post-remand the state court dismissed the case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Oct
31
2012
W.Va. Supreme Court Affirms Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses Against WVDEP In Surface Mine Board Appeals Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
6
2010
Tips for School Administrators on How to Handle "Sexting" Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
11
2010
Best Pleading Practices in Federal Court Following Twombly and Iqbal Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Oct
7
2010
West Virginia needs Substantive Right of Appeal Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
9
2012
The Second Circuit Interprets the Securities Exception to CAFA Jurisdiction and Remands a Case to State court Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
7
2010
Pay When Paid Clauses - Sword & Shield Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
10
2012
A Federal District Court in Florida Awards Attorneys’ Fees to the Plaintiff Based on the Defendants’ Improvident Removal of the Case Pursuant to CAFA More than Two Years After the State Court Complaint was Filed Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
16
2012
Northern District of Illinois Holds that Plaintiffs’ Proposal of a Consolidated Trial May Trigger Federal Jurisdiction Under CAFA as a Mass Action Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Feb
25
2011
Seeking CAFA Clarity: A Summary of Recent Case Law Addressing Challenges to Jurisdiction Under the Class Action Fairness Act Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
May
16
2012
Court Invalidates Ambush Election Regulation Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jan
12
2022
Ohio Third District Court of Appeals Holds Filing an Additional Condition Request Does Not Toll the Statute of Limitations in a Workers’ Comp Claim Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
6
2012
D. C. District Court Trumps EPA on Clean Water Act Permitting Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
10
2012
The Seventh Circuit Examines CAFA Amount in Controversy Evidence under the Legally Impossible Standard Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Nov
28
2012
West Virginia Surface Owners May Not Appeal Gas Well Permits Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jan
7
2020
A Proxy Season Guide to 2020 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Oct
1
2021
Cart before the Horse: Claimant Must Prove Condition Pre-existed Injury before Substantial Aggravation Can be Established Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Feb
12
2024
No Retaliatory Intent Needed: SCOTUS Eases Requirements for SOX Whistleblower Claims Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
1
2011
The Columbus Dispatch Advocates for Lawmakers to Create an Ohio False Claims Act Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
11
2012
An Arkansas District Court Holds That a Stipulation as to the Amount in Controversy Contained in the Body of the Complaint is Sufficient to Defeat CAFA Jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
16
2012
A federal district court in Louisiana addresses amount in controversy requirements in holding that a multi-plaintiff case is neither a class action nor a mass action under CAFA Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins