Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Apr
10
2019
Commercial Division Denies Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time to Serve Complaint After Plaintiff LLC Failed to Appear Through Counsel Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
10
2020
Virtual and Hybrid Shareholder Meetings in the Era of COVID-19: What Public Companies Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
13
2023
FTC Modifies Role of Administrative Judges Amid Heightened Agency Scrutiny Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
9
2024
Bank Groups Sue to Overturn New Community Lending Rules Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2009
California Passes New Electronic Discovery Act Effective Immediately Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
1
2010
Ninth Circuit Clarifies Rule 23 Class Certification Standard Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2010
California Court Addresses "Stray Remarks Doctrine" In Employment Discrimination Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
18
2010
No Private Right of Action for Violation of Statutes Extending Notice Period for Foreclosures Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2011
A MATRIXX Revolution, Part II: Supreme Court affirms Ninth Circuit's holding that Life Science Companies Cannot Rely On a Statistical Significance Standard When Deciding Whether Adverse Event Reports are Material for the Purpose of Securities Disclosures Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
12
2011
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Relief a Shareholder is Entitled For Inspection of Corporate Books And Records Pursuant To A Section 220 Demand Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
7
2013
Art Law: Russian Revolution Redux - Seized Painting During Russian Revolution Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2013
Massachusetts District Court Finds No Inference of Conspiracy Arising From Members of Standard Setting Organization Pursuing Self Interest In Refusing To Approve Plaintiff's Competing Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
10
2014
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Report Targets Arbitration Clauses Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
18
2014
Ninth Circuit Rules That Twombly Standard of Specificity Applies to FLSA Pleadings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2014
Mandatory Reporting of Foreign Direct Investments in the U.S. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
1
2015
The Broader Problem: European Bank Creates an Easy Catch for the Long Arm of U.S. Jurisdiction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
16
2015
California Court of Appeal Refuses to Enforce Forum Selection Clause Because Employer Would Not Stipulate to Apply California Law and Did Not Show that the Foreign State’s Legal Protections Were Equal to California’s Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2022
California Court of Appeal Holds that a Corporation’s Direct Cause of Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty is Legal Rather than Equitable, Requiring a Trial by Jury Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
14
2023
Healthier Choices Management Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. No. 22-1268 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2009
What Is the Jurisdictional Pre-Requisite for Copyright Litigation?: Do Denim v. Fried Denim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
20
2010
Time Out: California Court of Appeal Enforces Statute of Limitations in Class Action Brought Under the UCL Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
12
2010
Under CERCLA, "Owner" Means Owner When Cleanup Costs Are Incurred, Not When Reimbursement Is Sought Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2010
Second Circuit Holds That No Private Right Of Action Exists Under Section 304 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
28
2011
Delaware Supreme Court Holds That Chancery Court Is Not Bound By Merger Price Or Fairness Opinion In Appraisal Proceedings Under Delaware General Corporate Law Section 262(h) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
27
2011
Discover Bank Is Dead: The U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Federal Law Preempts State Laws That Obstruct The Enforcement Of Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2011
Interlocutory Appeal From Denial Of Twombly Motion to Dismiss in Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
13
2011
California Court of Appeal Clarifies Breach of Warranty Law in Class Actions and Vacates Order Certifying Class of Consumers in American Honda Motor Company, Inc. v. Superior Court Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
25
2013
Museum Loans - Part Two Re: International Loans Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
21
2013
Supreme Court Continues To Expand Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Preemption Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2013
Fifth Circuit Upholds The Validity Of Class-Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2014
Ninth Circuit Rejects Percentage Method To Determine Attorneys’ Fees In Class Action Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2014
Bitcoins and Liability in the Wake of Recent Silk Road Arrests Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
25
2014
U.S. Supreme Court Decision Gives More Latitude to Defeat Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuits Prior to Class Certification Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
28
2014
Recent Developments in Cases Dealing with the False Claims Act’s First-to-File and Public Disclosure Bars Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
4
2015
Ascertainability Saps Plaintiffs’ Energy in Dietary Supplement Class Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins