Mar 11 2013 |
Second Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Securities Act Violation Claims, Holding that Plaintiff's Allegations Were Sufficient to Plead a Reasonable Inference of Misrepresentations in a Prospectus |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 31 2013 |
BONDing WITH NPE's - The Requirement for Security for Costs or Expenses Under Section 1030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 4 2013 |
E.D.N.Y. Judge Reverses Course: Rule 41 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal in FLSA Action Does Not Require Court Approval |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 26 2013 |
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Preclusive Effect of Non-Delaware Dismissals and Rejects Irrebuttable Presumption That a Derivative Plaintiff Who Fails to Conduct a Section 220 Inspection Is an Inadequate Representative |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 29 2013 |
Ninth Circuit Falls In Line With Supreme Court Ruling on Class Action Removals |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 31 2013 |
New York Court of Appeals Places Burden on Employer to Plead that Employee Seeking Indefinite Leave Cannot Satisfy the Essential Requisites of the Job |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 19 2014 |
Comity and Commonality: A Tale of Two Identical Class Actions Brought By Forum-Shopping Plaintiffs’ Counsel |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 27 2014 |
Lessons From A Cautionary Tale of Electronic Discovery Pitfalls in Health Care Litigation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 15 2020 |
Fifth Circuit: Client Identity Not Privileged in IRS Probe |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 11 2010 |
California Statute Regarding Convenience Checks Not Facially Preempted By Federal Law |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 5 2011 |
Are You A Foreign Company With A Relationship To A New York Company? It May Be Your Agent And Provide A Basis For Jurisdiction |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 26 2011 |
Ninth Circuit Rejects Consumer Antitrust Challenge To Cable Television Bundling |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 23 2011 |
Partnership Pitfalls -- Things to Keep in Mind When Filing a Notice of Pendency Involving Partnership Assets |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 21 2013 |
Second Circuit Rules that the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Does Not Apply to Claims for Gap-Time Pay |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 23 2013 |
No Relief Under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) Section 473 For Missed Filing Deadline In California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Challenge |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 13 2013 |
Sixth Circuit Splits with Second and Ninth Circuits Regarding Need to Allege Defendants' State of Mind for Claims Challenging Soft Information Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 25 2014 |
Mum’s the Word: New York’s Highest Court Maintains Anonymity in Auction Sales |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 21 2014 |
Delaware Court of Chancery Grants Summary Judgment Dismissing Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims In Absence of Evidence of Directors’ “Conscious Disregard” of Fiduciary Duties |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 1 2014 |
Texas District Court Cites Recent “Evolution” of Rule 23 Standards to Deny Class Certification Motion in Securities Action Based Upon Allegedly Misleading Registration Statement |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 21 2014 |
New Decision Clarifies Summary Judgment Standards for Off-the-Clock Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 21 2014 |
Faulty Damages Model Leads to Partial Decertification in California |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 22 2020 |
Practical Considerations under FIDIC Contracts in Light of COVID-19 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 3 2021 |
Governor Cuomo’s “Tolling” of New York Statutes of Limitation Has Ended, But What Did It Accomplish? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 12 2010 |
DCAA Implements Federal Circuit Decision Requiring Interest Compounded Daily On Adjustments For CAS Noncompliances |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 30 2010 |
Ninth Circuit Holds That Safe Harbor Provision Of The Reform Act Applies To Forward-Looking Statements Accompanied By Cautionary Language And Forward-Looking Statements Made Without Actual Knowledge Of Falsity |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 5 2010 |
Bank Had No Duty to Advise Business Charge Card Owner that Bank had Obtained Judgment Against a Person Who Was Authorized to Use the Card |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 5 2011 |
Untimely Filing Of Motion To Dismiss Does Not Warrant Automatic Dismissal Where Motion Is Meritorious And Opposing Party Will Not Be Prejudiced |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 27 2011 |
Generic Drug Manufacturers And Failure To Warn: What duty is there after Pliva v. Mensing? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 15 2011 |
California Appellate Court Analyzes Employment Arbitration Agreement after Supreme Court's AT&T Decision |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 10 2013 |
U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Apply the "Discovery Rule" to Extend the Five-Year Statute of Limitations for SEC Punitive Fraud Enforcement Actions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 27 2013 |
Delaware Chancery Court Decisions Highlight That a "Crucial Difference" In Analyzing Director Liability For "Bad Faith" In the Context of an M&A Sales Process Is the Seriousness of the Bidder |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 30 2013 |
Ninth Circuit Rules that Comcast Does Not Kill Wage and Hour Class Actions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 25 2014 |
Commercial Division Justices Oing and Scarpulla Participate In New Pilot Program |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 9 2014 |
Seventh Circuit Affirms Lodestar Method to Determine Attorneys’ Fees in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Class Action Settlement |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 22 2014 |
First Circuit Affirms District Court’s Exclusion of Event Study as Unreliable Under Daubert |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |