Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Oct
31
2013
Buyer Beware: When the Financially Challenged Marketing Partner is a Co-Defendant in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Litigation Faegre Drinker
Jun
3
2014
Buying Standing? Buyer Beware. Re: Doctrine of Standing Sherin and Lodgen LLP
Jan
21
2022
Bylaw Notice Requirements - "Return to Sender, Address Unknown. No Such Number, No Such Zone." Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jul
8
2022
C-Suite Deposition Season Is Open In Georgia Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
13
2024
CA Bill Would Shift Lobby Filer Audits to Fair Political Practices Commission Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
20
2018
CA Court of Appeal Confirms Narrow Construction for Anti-SLAPP Commercial Speech Exemption Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
15
2021
CA Supreme Court Confirms Dynamex Applies Retroactively Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
2
2022
CAFA Appeals Cannot Address Other Jurisdictional Issues, According to the Fifth Circuit Robinson & Cole LLP
Sep
15
2010
CAFA Class Action Defense Cases–In re Burlington Northern: Seventh Circuit Reverses Remand Of Former Class Action Holding Jurisdiction Under Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) Determined At Time Of Removal Not After Amendment Of Complaint To Eliminate Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Mitchell LLP
Jan
16
2012
CAFA Connection: Cases Decided Under the Class Action Fairness Act Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Sep
12
2017
CAFC Finds Harmless Error in USPTO Reliance On Doctrine of Inherency Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
19
2021
Cal/OSHA’s Enforcement Authority Expanded Beveridge & Diamond PC
Oct
4
2023
California Adopts New Workplace Violence Prevention Law Beveridge & Diamond PC
Jun
5
2014
California Affirmative Action Plan: The “Dog Ate My Affirmative Action Plan” and Other Bad Excuses for Not Getting the Job Done Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
31
2023
California Amends Corporations Code to Authorize Audio Option for Shareholder/Member Meetings Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Feb
25
2022
California and Georgia Reach Settlement with Rent-to-Own Companies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
28
2022
California Anti-SLAPP Motions Are Safe in Federal Courts . . . For Now Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
15
2011
California Appellate Court Analyzes Employment Arbitration Agreement after Supreme Court's AT&T Decision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
7
2020
California Appellate Courts Have Yet To Address Caremark Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Dec
7
2012
California Attorney General Flexes Muscle on Mobile Privacy: AG Sues Delta for Lack of Privacy Policy on Mobile Application Ifrah Law
Jul
17
2023
California Believes Clams, Crabs and Bumblebees Are Fish, Does It Now Believe That Joshua Trees Are a Type of Asparagus? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Apr
10
2023
California Bill Would Create Decentralized Nonprofit Association Law Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Nov
30
2012
California Choice-of-Law Provision Constitutes Waiver of Federal Arbitration Act Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jan
5
2015
California Class Action an Occasion for all Employers to Review Vacation Practices Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
15
2014
California Corner: California Employers Have More Ammunition in Fighting Class Certification Vedder Price
Jun
18
2015
California Corporations Code: Do You Proffer, Profer, or Prefer A Complaint? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Aug
11
2010
California Court Addresses "Stray Remarks Doctrine" In Employment Discrimination Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
19
2021
California Court Addresses Outside Reverse Veil Piercing Of Chimeric LLC Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Apr
24
2013
California Court Denies Award for Damages Down to Background Levels and Soil/Groundwater Contamination Beveridge & Diamond PC
Sep
29
2014
California Court Finds Lack of Antitrust Standing for Price-Fixed Component Parts McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2021
California Court Finds Peer Review Speech, but Not Actions, Are Protected Under State Anti-SLAPP Statutes Polsinelli PC
Mar
13
2018
California Court Finds Russian Court's Service Comported With Due Process Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Aug
1
2013
California Court Finds Two State Agencies Are In Privity Despite Being Created By Separate Statutes Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Dec
10
2015
California Court Holds Extrinsic Evidence Was Inadmissible Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
May
16
2013
California Court Holds That the McCarran Ferguson Act Does Not "Reverse Preempt" Plaintiff's Rico Claims Against Insurer Dickinson Wright PLLC
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins