Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
May
22
2014
First Circuit Affirms District Court’s Exclusion of Event Study as Unreliable Under Daubert Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
25
2015
Clash of Civil and Common Law: Case Guidance System v. Stare Decisis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
22
2020
Practical Considerations under FIDIC Contracts in Light of COVID-19 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2021
Governor Cuomo’s “Tolling” of New York Statutes of Limitation Has Ended, But What Did It Accomplish? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
31
2010
California Courts Affirm Additional Settlements Over Vigorous Objections Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
14
2010
Sixth Circuit Remains Firm On Rule 9(b) In False Claims Act Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
23
2010
Supreme Court To Decide Fate Of Global Warming Litigation In American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
7
2011
Delaware Supreme Court Reverses Chancery Court Dismissal Of Derivative Plaintiff's Section 220 Books And Records Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
4
2013
California Supreme Court Resolves Split Over Accrual Rules for Unfair Competition Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
22
2013
The People's Supreme Court of China Issues Judicial Interpretation to Define Foreign-Related Civil Relationships Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
22
2013
Second Circuit Upholds Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements that Bar Title VII Class Actions, Finding that there is no Substantive Statutory Right to Pursue a Pattern-or-Practice Claim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
1
2013
Comcast v. Behrend Sets a Higher Bar for Class Certification Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2013
Fifth Circuit Holds That Securities Fraud Defendants May Not Rebut the Fraud-on-the-Market Presumption at the Class Certification Stage Through Evidence of No Price Impact Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2014
The Commercial Decision Reviews Arbitrations: Three Recent Decisions Clarify Standards For Actions Brought Pursuant To Article 75 of the CPLR Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
15
2015
Creative Construction: The Ninth Circuit Relaxes Removal Statute’s Timeliness Test in Class Action Fairness Act Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
20
2016
Did the FCA’s “Implied Certification” Theory Dodge a Bullet? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
20
2019
Ending Up On The Naughty List: Dismissal Of A Pending Appeal Under The Disentitlement Doctrine Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2020
Rolls-Royce Seeks to Resolve Circuit Split on Whether District Courts Can Order Discovery For Use in Private Arbitration Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
14
2020
Ixchel v. Biogen: California B2B Noncompetes Do Not Per Se Violate B&P Section 16600, and Are Instead Subject to Rule of Reason Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
9
2022
Commercial Division to Adopt New Rule Requiring Interlineation of Responsive Pleadings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
1
2010
United States Supreme Court Limits Extraterritorial Reach Of Private Federal Securities Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2010
Delaware Supreme Court Requires Credible Evidence of a "Proper Purpose" to Review a Corporation's Books and Records Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
20
2011
The Supreme Court To Decide Whether FOIA Responses Trigger The False Claims Act's Public Disclosure Bar Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
12
2011
California Court of Appeal Holds That State Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Securities Act Class Actions Unless the Action Is a "Covered Class Action" and Involves a "Covered Security" Under SLUSA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
5
2011
A Chapter 11 Diaspora? House Judiciary Committee Considers Chapter 11 Venue Reform Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
12
2013
Second Circuit Imposes Individual Liability on New York Mayoral Candidate for Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2019
Pursuing and Responding to Discovery Requests Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
18
2020
New Jersey Gives Employers a Break on New WARN Requirements Due to COVID-19 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
28
2022
California Supreme Court Holds That McDonnell Douglas Standard Should Not Be Used When Evaluating Whistleblower Retaliation Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
9
2022
California Court of Appeal Makes Clear that PAGA Plaintiffs are not Entitled to a Jury Trial and Provides Helpful Guidance on Suitable Seating Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
1
2022
NLRB to Decide Whether Misclassification Is Standalone Violation of the NLRA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
24
2023
Failure to Timely Produce in Discovery Underlying Written Contract with Insured Prevented General Contractor from Establishing Status as an Additional Insured Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
14
2010
CA Court of Appeal Affirms Multi-Million Settlement Despite Vigorous Objections Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2010
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Law Regarding Standing of Plaintiff-Shareholders to Bring a Post-Merger Double Derivative Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
12
2011
California Court Issues Tentative Ruling Enjoining AB 32 Implementation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins