Jul 30 2009 |
Appellate Court Decision Invalidating Unjustified "Affordable Housing In Lieu Fees" Is Now Final (BIACC v. City of Patterson) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 6 2010 |
Bank Not Liable In Nigerian-Style Email Scam |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 25 2010 |
Fraud Claim Against Syndicated Lender Allowed To Proceed, Despite Express Disclaimer Of Reliance In Deal Documents |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 24 2010 |
California Court of Appeal Allows Lawsuit Against an Employer for Allegedly Failing to Provide an Employee with "Suitable" Seating |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 29 2011 |
California Court Of Appeal Holds That Privity Of Contract Is Necessary To Maintain An Action For Rescission Under California Corporations Code Sections 25504 And 25504.1 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 29 2011 |
Prevailing Antitrust Defendants Recover $367,000 in e-Discovery Costs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 27 2013 |
Second Circuit Reverses Class Certification Order, Holding That a Clearing Broker's Alleged Knowledge of Fraud Against Shareholders, Absence Direct Involvement, Is Insufficient to Create a Duty of Disclosure |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 4 2013 |
Plaintiffs' Bar is Whistling Past the Graveyard on Comcast Re: Supreme Court Anti-Class Certification Decision |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 11 2013 |
Comments on Recent Changes to the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 30 2013 |
First Department Refuses to Expand Jurisdiction over Foreign Entities |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 10 2014 |
Monetary Threshold For Commencing Cases In Manhattan’s Commercial Division Raised to $500,000 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 16 2014 |
Top Five Tips For Minimizing The Risk of Class Action Litigation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 31 2019 |
New Executive Orders Aim to Eliminate Unfair Surprise in Civil Enforcement Actions by Formalizing Guidance Documents |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 14 2020 |
California Court Sets High Bar For Class Certification In False Advertising Cases |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 25 2022 |
California and Georgia Reach Settlement with Rent-to-Own Companies |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 13 2023 |
Navigating Dual Purpose Communications After SCOTUS (Almost) Weighs in on Attorney-Client Privilege: 5 Practical Tips for Healthcare Attorneys |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 27 2010 |
California Endangered Species Act Prohibits State Agencies From Taking Threatened and Endangered Species Without Permit Authority |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 13 2010 |
California Court Of Appeal Holds That Shareholders Have Standing To Pursue Derivative Actions After Dissolution Of A Corporation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 29 2011 |
Provisions in CC&R's Requiring Arbitration of Claims Against Developers by Homeowners Associations or Owners Are Not Enforceable |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 13 2011 |
Wal-Mart v. Dukes: Implications For Antitrust Class Actions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 19 2011 |
Second Circuit Addresses Materiality at the Pleadings Stage in Two Recent Decisions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 24 2011 |
"First Impression" Ruling: Court May Review the Rationality of Emails Sent By GAO Attorneys |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 9 2013 |
Eastern and Southern New York District Courts Compel Plaintiffs to Arbitrate their FLSA Collective Action Claims on an Individualized Basis |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 20 2013 |
Supreme Court Ruling Reverses Bad 9th Circuit Precedent on Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 13 2013 |
The Unemployed Are Now Protected Under The New York City Human Rights Law |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 12 2013 |
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Not Needed Before Starting Eminent Domain Proceeding |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 21 2013 |
Failure To Separately Notice Consideration Of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Document Violates Brown Act |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 28 2013 |
A False Claims Act Kerfuffle: First Circuit Reaffirms the Intent of the "First to File" Rule and Deepens Circuit Split |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 27 2014 |
Ninth Circuit Once Again Affirms That Malicious Actions To Destroy A Competitor Do Not State An Antitrust Claim Unless Accompanied By Injury To Competition |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 15 2014 |
Clear Sailing Ahead For Class Counsel in California Settlement |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 2 2016 |
Supreme Court Holds Rejected Rule 68 Offer of Judgment Does Not Moot Class Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 10 2017 |
In January, Will You be Able to Board Your Domestic Flight with Your Current Driver’s License? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 29 2020 |
DC Circuit Repudiates SEC Program for Testing Exchange Fee Structures |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 30 2021 |
Delaware Supreme Court Shines Spotlight on Boilerplate Purchase Agreement Provisions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 6 2022 |
California Court of Appeal Addresses Derivative Standing and Failure of Oversight Claims Under Delaware Law |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |