Aug 1 2010 |
United States Supreme Court Limits Extraterritorial Reach Of Private Federal Securities Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 25 2010 |
Delaware Supreme Court Requires Credible Evidence of a "Proper Purpose" to Review a Corporation's Books and Records |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 20 2011 |
The Supreme Court To Decide Whether FOIA Responses Trigger The False Claims Act's Public Disclosure Bar |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 12 2011 |
California Court of Appeal Holds That State Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Securities Act Class Actions Unless the Action Is a "Covered Class Action" and Involves a "Covered Security" Under SLUSA |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 5 2011 |
A Chapter 11 Diaspora? House Judiciary Committee Considers Chapter 11 Venue Reform |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 12 2013 |
Second Circuit Imposes Individual Liability on New York Mayoral Candidate for Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 12 2013 |
United States Supreme Court Holds that Contractual Forum-Selection Clauses Deserve Near Absolute Deference In Considering Changes of Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 6 2015 |
The Pitfalls of Ascertaining Ascertainability: Seventh Circuit Declines to Adopt Heightened Threshold Requirement for Class Actions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 21 2016 |
Not Taking “Yes” For An Answer: U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Unaccepted Offer Of Complete Individual Relief Does Not Moot Plaintiff’s Individual Or Class Action Claim |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 29 2019 |
Pursuing and Responding to Discovery Requests Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 19 2020 |
Delaware Supreme Court Confirms That Federal Forum Provision Is Facially Valid, Reversing Court of Chancery |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 9 2022 |
Forum Selection Clause Can Preclude PTO Validity Challenges |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 16 2023 |
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 14 2010 |
CA Court of Appeal Affirms Multi-Million Settlement Despite Vigorous Objections |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 3 2010 |
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Law Regarding Standing of Plaintiff-Shareholders to Bring a Post-Merger Double Derivative Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 12 2011 |
California Court Issues Tentative Ruling Enjoining AB 32 Implementation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 28 2011 |
Ninth Circuit Latest to Permit Corporate Liability Under Alien Tort Statute; Supreme Court to Resolve Circuit Split in 2012 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 10 2013 |
9th Circuit Applies Dukes v. Wal-Mart to a Wage/Hour Class Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 13 2013 |
Second Circuit Rules That Putative Auction Rate Securities Class Action Complaints Failed to Adequately Plead Antitrust Conspiracy |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 2 2013 |
Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act Defeats Claim Against Holder Of Patent Incorporated Into Industry Standard |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 6 2013 |
Substantial Evidence Test Applies to Decision Not to Require Additional Environmental Impact Report (EIR) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 28 2014 |
United States Supreme Court Holds That Non-U.S. Corporations Are Subject to General Personal Jurisdiction in U.S. States Only in States Where They Are “At Home” |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 4 2014 |
Second Circuit Defines “Customer” for Mandatory FINRA Arbitration |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 22 2014 |
Employer Permitted to Use “After-Acquired” Evidence at Discrimination Trial |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 18 2014 |
No Proof Necessary: SCOTUS Rules Defendant’s Notice Of Removal Under CAFA Need Not Include Evidence of The Amount In Controversy |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 29 2016 |
Attacking Class Action Allegations On The Pleadings Can Be A Successful Strategy |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 18 2016 |
U.S. Supreme Court Remands Spokeo; Ninth Circuit Must Consider Whether “Concrete” Injury Occurred |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 30 2019 |
Second Circuit Affirms “Snap” Removal Practice |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 6 2021 |
The Second Department Weighs in on Tolling vs. Suspension of Statutes of Limitation Pursuant to Governor Cuomo’s COVID-era Executive Orders |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 3 2024 |
FTC Cracks Down on Payments Processor for Facilitating Fraud |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 25 2010 |
California Court Takes On Trade-Secret Preemption of Other Civil Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 16 2010 |
Gucci's Attempt to Extend Trademark Infringement Liability to Credit Card Merchant Service Providers Survives Motion to Dismiss |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 5 2010 |
Ninth Circuit Finds Employment Agreement Ambiguous As To Whether An Employee's "Ideas" Were Assigned To Employer |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 26 2010 |
Dead Zone? Direct Claims by Creditors of a California Corporation May Not Lie Against Management Based on Management's Allegedly Shifting Duties When Corporation Is in the Zone of Insolvency or Even Insolvent |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 4 2011 |
E-CIGARETTES GET A "SMOKING" BREAK: D.C. Circuit Clarifies Scope of FDA's Authority Over E-Cigarettes |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |