Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jun
30
2013
Federal Court Stops Serial Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Plaintiff's Latest Effort: Payne v. Chapel Hill North Properties Poyner Spruill LLP
May
8
2012
The Dawning of the Age of ALJ Final Decisions Poyner Spruill LLP
Sep
8
2010
Debt Collection Attorneys Liable Under Fair Debt Collection Practices Act for Mistakes of Law Poyner Spruill LLP
Aug
30
2009
General Growth Properties and the Boundaries of Bankruptcy Remoteness Bingham McCutchen LLP
Sep
11
2009
ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMS ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION Clark Hill PLC
Sep
9
2010
Second Circuit Finds Personal Jurisdiction Over California Vendor Based on the Shipment of a Single Product Bearing Counterfeit Mark to Brand Owner’s Attorneys in New York Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
11
2010
The Seventh Circuit Finds Personal Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Internet Company Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
16
2011
Entrepreneur’s Guide to Litigation – Blog Series: Trial Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
16
2011
Governor Signs Law Setting Factors for Determining Attorney Fees and Capping Certain Attorney Fees Awards Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
16
2014
A $21 Million Lesson for Joint Employers Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
17
2011
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes A New Test To Determine Whether Non-Compete Agreements Are Enforceable Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
18
2010
The Seventh Circuit Rules That Electronic Confirmations of Internet Transactions Are Not Actionable Under FACTA Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
2
2011
Section 145 Action to Obtain a Patent Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
2
2011
New York Federal District Court Addresses the Pleading Standard and Constitutionality of False Patent Marking Claims Under 35 U.S.C. § 292 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
1
2012
Wisconsin Supreme Court: Reservation of Rights Letter Not Required to Preserve Coverage Defenses Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
4
2013
Comcast v. Behrend Strikes Again: Supreme Court Vacates and Remands Ross v. RBS Citizens, N.A. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
8
2013
U.S. Supreme Court Continues to Uphold Arbitration Agreements Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
12
2014
Better Call Saul -- Human Resources and Damage Control Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
8
2011
Appearance-Based Discrimination Not Actionable in Wisconsin Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
2
2011
United States Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Arbitration Agreements That Do Not Permit Class Action Litigation Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
22
2011
Entrepreneur’s Guide to Litigation – Blog Series: Appeal Process Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
28
2013
Raising the Bar: Supreme Court Holds Merits Inquiry Requires Link Between Plaintiff’s Liability and Damages Theories at Certification Stage of Class Action Case Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
5
2014
Does Your Outside Counsel Firm Understand the Bank Examination Privilege? It Should. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
19
2010
Wisconsin Supreme Court: Settling Within Policy Limits Does Not Preclude a Bad Faith Claim Against Insurer Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
22
2013
Supreme Court Affirms Notion That Class Actions Can Be Avoided Through Arbitration Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
10
2013
Eight Simple Rules for Testifying as a Witness Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
10
2014
Patent Co-Owner’s Refusal to Join Suit Defeats Standing to Sue for Patent Infringement Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
22
2010
Wisconsin Supreme Court: “Follow Form” Provision May Trigger the Duty to Defend Under Indemnity Policies Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
29
2012
“The Next Asbestos” – False Advertising and Mislabeling Class Action Lawsuits Against the Agriculture, Food and Beverage Industry Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
6
2011
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Clarifies the Pleading Standard for False Patent Marking Claims Under 35 U.S.C. § 292 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
29
2011
Entrepreneur’s Guide to Litigation – Blog Series: Post-Trial and Execution on Judgment Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
24
2014
Lighting Ballast v. Philips – Federal Circuit Will Maintain De Novo Review of Claim Construction Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
18
2013
What are the Strategic Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Genesis Healthcare v. Symczyk? Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
15
2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: An Introduction Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
11
2015
Issuance of Discovery, Subpoenas and Process to Take Depositions in Wisconsin for Use in Other States is About to Change Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins