Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
May
26
2009
Defamation Suits in Illinois: Businesses Beware the Citizen Participation Act Much Shelist, P.C.
Sep
21
2012
Employers Beware: The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Is a Sword with Two Edges Much Shelist, P.C.
May
29
2009
Grappling with Electronic Discovery Much Shelist, P.C.
May
31
2009
Class Action Arbitration on the Rise: Beware the Risks Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
11
2009
Arbitration Clauses: Why Nursing Facilities Should Consider Adding Them to New Resident Contracts Much Shelist, P.C.
Jun
14
2011
What Third-Party Retaliation Means for Your Business Much Shelist, P.C.
Dec
10
2014
Today’s Contracts Enforceability Issues, Part II: Those Pesky Forum Selection Clauses Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
26
2010
Patent Precautions: Avoiding Errors in Inventorship Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
22
2012
Additional Insured Endorsements Continue to be the Subject of Litigation in Illinois Much Shelist, P.C.
Dec
24
2012
"All Knowledge Is Inferential": Is the Use of Qualifiers In An Affidavit Sufficient? Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
24
2012
Enforcing Non-Compete Agreements: Go Where the Case Law Is Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
27
2010
Confession of Judgment in Illinois: A Deceptively Simple Remedy Much Shelist, P.C.
Dec
10
2011
Debtors Need Lawyers, Too: Illinois Courts Ensure Access Much Shelist, P.C.
Apr
24
2012
Seventh Circuit Decision May Spur Limited Revival of HAMP Claims Against Loan Servicers Much Shelist, P.C.
Mar
18
2012
Contractual Non-Reliance Clauses: Insulating Defendants from Civil Fraud Claims Since 1995 Much Shelist, P.C.
May
24
2013
You Signed What?! Indemnification Provisions in Construction-Related Agreements Much Shelist, P.C.
Jul
31
2009
Abstention as an Alternative: Bankruptcy Court Is Not Always the Best Place to Be Much Shelist, P.C.
Jul
31
2009
Notice Pleading: A Recent Supreme Court Decision May Upset an Ingrained Legal Standard Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
5
2009
Supreme Court Decision Impacts Federal Age Discrimination Claims Clark & Trevithick
Jun
30
2009
Ninth Circuit Rules on Copyright Act -- Attorney's Fees Clark & Trevithick
Jan
25
2014
Mum’s the Word: New York’s Highest Court Maintains Anonymity in Auction Sales Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
21
2014
Delaware Court of Chancery Grants Summary Judgment Dismissing Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims In Absence of Evidence of Directors’ “Conscious Disregard” of Fiduciary Duties Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
1
2014
Texas District Court Cites Recent “Evolution” of Rule 23 Standards to Deny Class Certification Motion in Securities Action Based Upon Allegedly Misleading Registration Statement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
21
2014
New Decision Clarifies Summary Judgment Standards for Off-the-Clock Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
21
2014
Faulty Damages Model Leads to Partial Decertification in California Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
15
2020
Fifth Circuit: Client Identity Not Privileged in IRS Probe Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
11
2010
California Statute Regarding Convenience Checks Not Facially Preempted By Federal Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
5
2011
Are You A Foreign Company With A Relationship To A New York Company? It May Be Your Agent And Provide A Basis For Jurisdiction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
26
2011
Ninth Circuit Rejects Consumer Antitrust Challenge To Cable Television Bundling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
23
2011
Partnership Pitfalls -- Things to Keep in Mind When Filing a Notice of Pendency Involving Partnership Assets Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
21
2013
Second Circuit Rules that the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Does Not Apply to Claims for Gap-Time Pay Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
23
2013
No Relief Under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) Section 473 For Missed Filing Deadline In California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Challenge Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
13
2013
Sixth Circuit Splits with Second and Ninth Circuits Regarding Need to Allege Defendants' State of Mind for Claims Challenging Soft Information Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2014
Commercial Division Justices Oing and Scarpulla Participate In New Pilot Program Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
9
2014
Seventh Circuit Affirms Lodestar Method to Determine Attorneys’ Fees in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Class Action Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins