Apr 24 2012 |
Seventh Circuit Decision May Spur Limited Revival of HAMP Claims Against Loan Servicers |
Much Shelist, P.C. |
Mar 18 2012 |
Contractual Non-Reliance Clauses: Insulating Defendants from Civil Fraud Claims Since 1995 |
Much Shelist, P.C. |
May 24 2013 |
You Signed What?! Indemnification Provisions in Construction-Related Agreements |
Much Shelist, P.C. |
Jun 30 2009 |
Ninth Circuit Rules on Copyright Act -- Attorney's Fees |
Clark & Trevithick |
Aug 5 2009 |
Supreme Court Decision Impacts Federal Age Discrimination Claims |
Clark & Trevithick |
Jul 4 2010 |
The California Court Of Appeal Narrowly Interprets The Perata Mortgage Relief Act |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 14 2010 |
Three-Year Statute Of Limitations Applies To Inverse Condemnation Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 25 2011 |
Indirect Purchaser Plavix Class Actions Tossed for Lack of Antitrust Standing |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 31 2011 |
Expanded Standing, or "Back to Basics"? Flash Memory Direct Purchasers Found to Have Standing to Assert Walker Process Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 9 2013 |
Line in the Sand: Siemens Argentina Case Limits Personal Jurisdiction Under the "FCPA" Foreign Corrupt Practices Act |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 3 2013 |
Transfer $8 Million Out Of Accounts In New York? That Action Alone Is Not Sufficient To Establish Personal Jurisdiction |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 8 2013 |
Third and Seventh Circuit Courts of Appeals Issue TCPA Decisions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 11 2014 |
I Scream, You Scream, We All Scream For…Ascertainability? Re: How Ben & Jerry’s Defeated an “All Natural” Class Certification Motion |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 2 2014 |
California Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Class Certification of Independent Contract Class Actions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 2 2014 |
Another Blow to Call Recording Class Actions in California |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 1 2016 |
Department of Justice Rule Increases False Claims Act Penalties to Over $20,000 Per Claim |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 22 2020 |
Fifth Circuit Affirms Attorney’s Fee Award of $2.3 million in Misappropriation Case Against Former Employee who Failed to Comply with Court’s Objections Order |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 29 2021 |
“What’s In A Name?”: Federal Circuit Holds Claims Court Blurred Distinction Between ‘Size Protests’ And ‘Bid Protests’ In Dismissal For Failure To Exhaust Administrative Remedies |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 4 2023 |
New York Courts Continue to Assert Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Banks |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 9 2024 |
Bank Groups Sue to Overturn New Community Lending Rules |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 6 2010 |
Bank Not Liable In Nigerian-Style Email Scam |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 25 2010 |
Fraud Claim Against Syndicated Lender Allowed To Proceed, Despite Express Disclaimer Of Reliance In Deal Documents |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 24 2010 |
California Court of Appeal Allows Lawsuit Against an Employer for Allegedly Failing to Provide an Employee with "Suitable" Seating |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 29 2011 |
California Court Of Appeal Holds That Privity Of Contract Is Necessary To Maintain An Action For Rescission Under California Corporations Code Sections 25504 And 25504.1 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 29 2011 |
Prevailing Antitrust Defendants Recover $367,000 in e-Discovery Costs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 27 2013 |
Second Circuit Reverses Class Certification Order, Holding That a Clearing Broker's Alleged Knowledge of Fraud Against Shareholders, Absence Direct Involvement, Is Insufficient to Create a Duty of Disclosure |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 4 2013 |
Plaintiffs' Bar is Whistling Past the Graveyard on Comcast Re: Supreme Court Anti-Class Certification Decision |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 11 2013 |
Comments on Recent Changes to the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 30 2013 |
First Department Refuses to Expand Jurisdiction over Foreign Entities |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 10 2014 |
Monetary Threshold For Commencing Cases In Manhattan’s Commercial Division Raised to $500,000 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 16 2014 |
Top Five Tips For Minimizing The Risk of Class Action Litigation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 31 2019 |
New Executive Orders Aim to Eliminate Unfair Surprise in Civil Enforcement Actions by Formalizing Guidance Documents |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 14 2020 |
California Court Sets High Bar For Class Certification In False Advertising Cases |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 30 2009 |
Appellate Court Decision Invalidating Unjustified "Affordable Housing In Lieu Fees" Is Now Final (BIACC v. City of Patterson) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 27 2010 |
California Endangered Species Act Prohibits State Agencies From Taking Threatened and Endangered Species Without Permit Authority |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 13 2010 |
California Court Of Appeal Holds That Shareholders Have Standing To Pursue Derivative Actions After Dissolution Of A Corporation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 29 2011 |
Provisions in CC&R's Requiring Arbitration of Claims Against Developers by Homeowners Associations or Owners Are Not Enforceable |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 13 2011 |
Wal-Mart v. Dukes: Implications For Antitrust Class Actions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 19 2011 |
Second Circuit Addresses Materiality at the Pleadings Stage in Two Recent Decisions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 24 2011 |
"First Impression" Ruling: Court May Review the Rationality of Emails Sent By GAO Attorneys |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 9 2013 |
Eastern and Southern New York District Courts Compel Plaintiffs to Arbitrate their FLSA Collective Action Claims on an Individualized Basis |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 20 2013 |
Supreme Court Ruling Reverses Bad 9th Circuit Precedent on Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 13 2013 |
The Unemployed Are Now Protected Under The New York City Human Rights Law |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 12 2013 |
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Not Needed Before Starting Eminent Domain Proceeding |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 21 2013 |
Failure To Separately Notice Consideration Of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Document Violates Brown Act |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 28 2013 |
A False Claims Act Kerfuffle: First Circuit Reaffirms the Intent of the "First to File" Rule and Deepens Circuit Split |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 27 2014 |
Ninth Circuit Once Again Affirms That Malicious Actions To Destroy A Competitor Do Not State An Antitrust Claim Unless Accompanied By Injury To Competition |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 15 2014 |
Clear Sailing Ahead For Class Counsel in California Settlement |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 2 2016 |
Supreme Court Holds Rejected Rule 68 Offer of Judgment Does Not Moot Class Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 10 2017 |
In January, Will You be Able to Board Your Domestic Flight with Your Current Driver’s License? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |