Dec 20 2019 |
Ending Up On The Naughty List: Dismissal Of A Pending Appeal Under The Disentitlement Doctrine |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 23 2020 |
Rolls-Royce Seeks to Resolve Circuit Split on Whether District Courts Can Order Discovery For Use in Private Arbitration |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 14 2020 |
Ixchel v. Biogen: California B2B Noncompetes Do Not Per Se Violate B&P Section 16600, and Are Instead Subject to Rule of Reason |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 9 2022 |
Commercial Division to Adopt New Rule Requiring Interlineation of Responsive Pleadings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 1 2010 |
United States Supreme Court Limits Extraterritorial Reach Of Private Federal Securities Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 25 2010 |
Delaware Supreme Court Requires Credible Evidence of a "Proper Purpose" to Review a Corporation's Books and Records |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 20 2011 |
The Supreme Court To Decide Whether FOIA Responses Trigger The False Claims Act's Public Disclosure Bar |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 12 2011 |
California Court of Appeal Holds That State Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Securities Act Class Actions Unless the Action Is a "Covered Class Action" and Involves a "Covered Security" Under SLUSA |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 5 2011 |
A Chapter 11 Diaspora? House Judiciary Committee Considers Chapter 11 Venue Reform |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 10 2013 |
9th Circuit Applies Dukes v. Wal-Mart to a Wage/Hour Class Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 13 2013 |
Second Circuit Rules That Putative Auction Rate Securities Class Action Complaints Failed to Adequately Plead Antitrust Conspiracy |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 2 2013 |
Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act Defeats Claim Against Holder Of Patent Incorporated Into Industry Standard |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 12 2013 |
United States Supreme Court Holds that Contractual Forum-Selection Clauses Deserve Near Absolute Deference In Considering Changes of Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 6 2015 |
The Pitfalls of Ascertaining Ascertainability: Seventh Circuit Declines to Adopt Heightened Threshold Requirement for Class Actions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 21 2016 |
Not Taking “Yes” For An Answer: U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Unaccepted Offer Of Complete Individual Relief Does Not Moot Plaintiff’s Individual Or Class Action Claim |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 29 2019 |
Pursuing and Responding to Discovery Requests Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 18 2020 |
New Jersey Gives Employers a Break on New WARN Requirements Due to COVID-19 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 28 2022 |
California Supreme Court Holds That McDonnell Douglas Standard Should Not Be Used When Evaluating Whistleblower Retaliation Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 9 2022 |
California Court of Appeal Makes Clear that PAGA Plaintiffs are not Entitled to a Jury Trial and Provides Helpful Guidance on Suitable Seating Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 1 2022 |
NLRB to Decide Whether Misclassification Is Standalone Violation of the NLRA |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 24 2023 |
Failure to Timely Produce in Discovery Underlying Written Contract with Insured Prevented General Contractor from Establishing Status as an Additional Insured |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 14 2010 |
CA Court of Appeal Affirms Multi-Million Settlement Despite Vigorous Objections |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 3 2010 |
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Law Regarding Standing of Plaintiff-Shareholders to Bring a Post-Merger Double Derivative Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 12 2011 |
California Court Issues Tentative Ruling Enjoining AB 32 Implementation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 28 2011 |
Ninth Circuit Latest to Permit Corporate Liability Under Alien Tort Statute; Supreme Court to Resolve Circuit Split in 2012 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 6 2013 |
Second Circuit Overturns Class Certification Order in Assistant Branch Manager Overtime Case |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 29 2013 |
Second Circuit Reaffirms Continued Use of the "Knowing Possession" Causation Standard in Rajaratnam Insider Trading Case |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 6 2013 |
Substantial Evidence Test Applies to Decision Not to Require Additional Environmental Impact Report (EIR) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 28 2014 |
United States Supreme Court Holds That Non-U.S. Corporations Are Subject to General Personal Jurisdiction in U.S. States Only in States Where They Are “At Home” |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 4 2014 |
Second Circuit Defines “Customer” for Mandatory FINRA Arbitration |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 22 2014 |
Employer Permitted to Use “After-Acquired” Evidence at Discrimination Trial |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 18 2014 |
No Proof Necessary: SCOTUS Rules Defendant’s Notice Of Removal Under CAFA Need Not Include Evidence of The Amount In Controversy |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 29 2016 |
Attacking Class Action Allegations On The Pleadings Can Be A Successful Strategy |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 18 2016 |
U.S. Supreme Court Remands Spokeo; Ninth Circuit Must Consider Whether “Concrete” Injury Occurred |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 30 2019 |
Second Circuit Affirms “Snap” Removal Practice |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 19 2020 |
Delaware Supreme Court Confirms That Federal Forum Provision Is Facially Valid, Reversing Court of Chancery |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 9 2022 |
Forum Selection Clause Can Preclude PTO Validity Challenges |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 16 2023 |
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 25 2010 |
California Court Takes On Trade-Secret Preemption of Other Civil Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 16 2010 |
Gucci's Attempt to Extend Trademark Infringement Liability to Credit Card Merchant Service Providers Survives Motion to Dismiss |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 5 2010 |
Ninth Circuit Finds Employment Agreement Ambiguous As To Whether An Employee's "Ideas" Were Assigned To Employer |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 26 2010 |
Dead Zone? Direct Claims by Creditors of a California Corporation May Not Lie Against Management Based on Management's Allegedly Shifting Duties When Corporation Is in the Zone of Insolvency or Even Insolvent |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 4 2011 |
E-CIGARETTES GET A "SMOKING" BREAK: D.C. Circuit Clarifies Scope of FDA's Authority Over E-Cigarettes |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 14 2011 |
Court to Lenders: Strict Compliance with Local Recording Requirements Necessary |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 27 2011 |
Anonymous Bloggers And The First Amendment: When And How Your Company Can Identify Its John Doe Defendants |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 13 2012 |
Default Judgment Is Not Available In Actions To Quiet Title |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 25 2014 |
Delaware Chancery Court Declines to Apply Offer-of-Judgment Rule in Appraisal Proceedings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 1 2014 |
Are Call Recording Class Actions Doomed in California? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 15 2014 |
Sweet(ener) Confusion: California District Court Divide Over Role of Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine in “Evaporated Cane Juice” Cases Grows |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 28 2015 |
Hold the Phone: Illinois Federal Judge Holds Dish Network on the Line for Tens of Millions of Calls, but Leaves Silver Lining for TCPA Defendants |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |