Constitutional Law

The Constitution is a document constantly analyzed for its impact and meaning, and how the principles within apply to modern legal issues. Litigation happens on a regular basis in the circuit courts and the Supreme Court that impacts the way the Constitution is interpreted, and the National Law Review has legal analysis on these cases and interpretations, as well as predictions on how these cases might land.

The First Amendment Right to Free Speech, the Right to Protection Against Unreasonable Search and Seizure under the Fourth Amendment, Due process violations under the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Government’s Power of Eminent Domain, afforded under the Fifth Amendment, are among the leading stories and news visitors will read about on the National Law Review. How these provisions might apply to modern scenarios not envisioned by the Founding Fathers is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

The Establishment Clause and Dormant Commerce Clause under the Fifth and First Amendments, and Anti-discrimination laws under the First Amendment are some of the topics covered by the National Law Review. Visitors can read about Constitutional issues in litigation, including Article III, which affords a party to bring forth a case at the federal or state level. The constitutionality of administrative proceedings against Administrative agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and agencies that govern immigration like the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), are among the different types of commentary and stories visitors will read about on the site.

The National Law Review covers topics related to all Amendments under the Constitution, citizens' and civil rights, agency rights, and the different clauses which are set forth under those amendments. For visitors who want to learn about the latest challenges to the Constitution or Amendments, Supreme Court Decisions, and cases that set forth new precedent, based on the Constitution and Constitutional rights, can find these stories on the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jul
28
2014
Was It Wirth It? The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Sets a Low Bar for Minimum Contacts McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
8
2016
Ninth Circuit Opinion Calls into Question Constitutionality of California Tied-House Laws McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
26
2019
Trust Wins Due Process Challenge to North Carolina State Income Tax McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
9
2019
SCOTUS Refuses To Review Ninth Circuit Ruling On ACA Birth Control Rules McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2013
Employers Should Review How Plan Documents Define Spouse in Light of Recent Benefits Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
17
2013
IRS Guidance on Employment and Income Tax Refunds on Same-Sex Spouse Benefits McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
13
2020
DÉJÀ VU – SCOTUS to Review Validity of Affordable Care Act McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2020
Neither AIA Proceeding nor Government Infringement Constitute Fifth Amendment Taking McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2013
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Labor (DOL) Guidance Clarifies Employee Benefits Impact of Supreme Court’s Defense of Marriage (DOMA) Ruling McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
17
2013
Following Recent Maryland Ruling, Federal Court Declares New Jersey Scheme to Promote Investment in In-State Generation Unconstitutional McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2013
Voiding of Illinois Sales Tax Regulation Leads to Prospective Uncertainty for Sourcing Sales McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
13
2014
Inside the New York Budget Bill Part Four: Nexus McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2015
Portion of California Resale Royalty Act Struck Down as Unconstitutional McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
20
2019
TTB Label Approval System Survives First Amendment Challenge from DC Brewery McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
20
2019
Fifth Circuit Issues ACA Ruling, But Severability Question Remains McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
18
2020
2019 In Review: Overview Of Cartel Investigations McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
24
2022
The Overturning of Roe v. Wade McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
18
2023
District Court Finding Doesn’t Preclude PTAB Proceeding McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2019
Academic Freedom: Whose right is it anyway? Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jun
18
2021
Supreme Court Update: California v. Texas (No. 19-840), Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (No. 19-123), Nestle USA v. Doe (No. 19-416), Borden v. United States (No. 19-5410), Greer v. United States (No. 19-8709), Terry v. United States (No. 20-5904) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jul
6
2021
Supreme Court Update: TransUnion v. Ramirez (No. 20-297), PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey (No. 19-1039) Wiggin and Dana LLP
May
1
2020
Recent Supreme Court Decisions in IP Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jul
10
2020
Supreme Court Update: Chiafalo v. Washington (No. 19-465), Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants (No. 19-631). Wiggin and Dana LLP
May
5
2020
Supreme Court Update: New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. City of New York (No. 18-280), Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (No. 18-1150), Maine Community Health Options v. United States, No. 18-1023 Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jun
24
2021
Supreme Court Update: Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. (No. 20-255), Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (No. 20-107), Collins v. Yellen (No. 19-422), Lange v. California (No. 20-18), NCAA v. Alston (No. 20-512), United States v. Arthrex (No. 19-1434), Gold Wiggin and Dana LLP
Dec
12
2020
Supreme Court Update: Tanzin v. Tanvir (No. 19-71); Carney v. Adams (No. 19-309); United States v. Briggs (No. 19-108); Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (No. 18-540) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Apr
27
2020
Supreme Court Update: Ramos v. Louisiana (No. 18-5924), Atlantic Richfield v. Christian (No. 17-1498), Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies (No. 18-916) Wiggin and Dana LLP
May
7
2020
The Department of Education Issues Final Title IX Regulations Wiggin and Dana LLP
May
21
2021
Supreme Court Update: Jones v. Mississippi (No. 18-1259, Niz-Chavez v. Garland (No. 19-863), Edwards v. Vannoy (No. 19-5807), Caniglia v. Strom (No. 20-157), B.P. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (No. 19-1189), CIC Services v. IRS (No. 19-930) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jul
1
2018
Supreme Court Update: Trump v. Hawaii (17-965) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jan
11
2019
Supreme Court Update: Schein v. Archer & White Sales (No. 17-1272), Culbertson v. Berryhill (No. 17-773), City of Escondido v. Emmons (No. 17-1660), Shoop v. Hill (No. 18-56) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jun
24
2019
Supreme Court Update: American Legion v. American Humanist Association (No. 17-1717) and Gundy v. United States (No. 17-6086) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jul
16
2020
Supreme Court Update: McGirt v. Oklahoma (No. 18-9526), Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP (No 19-715), Trump v. Vance (No. 19-635) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Dec
21
2020
Supreme Court Update: Trump v. New York (No. 20-366) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Dec
4
2017
Exploring the Boundaries of the Fifth Amendment Wiggin and Dana LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins