Apr 16 2023 |
Access to Abortion Pill in Limbo: Navigating the Intricacies of Conflicting Federal Court Rulings in Texas and Washington State |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 10 2011 |
Another California Court of Appeal Finds California's Special Protections for Labor Picketing to be Unconstitutional |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 6 2013 |
United States v. Windsor Creates New Estate Planning Opportunities For Married Same-Sex Couples |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 20 2013 |
Antitrust Exclusive Dealing Claims Given "Short-Shrift" in Dismissal. How Long Is Short? An Analysis in Search of Context |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 8 2013 |
California Tax Relief for Sellers of Qualified Small Business Stock |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 21 2014 |
Executive Orders and New Employment Requirements for Federal Contractors |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 7 2019 |
Update to Texas v. United States: DOJ Files a Brief in Support of Eliminating the ACA |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 19 2013 |
New Jersey Supreme Court Expands State Law Retaliation Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 31 2013 |
New York Court of Appeals Places Burden on Employer to Plead that Employee Seeking Indefinite Leave Cannot Satisfy the Essential Requisites of the Job |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 25 2022 |
Supreme Court Discrimination Case Narrows Scope of Restitution for Individuals |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 27 2022 |
Supreme Court Rules for Physicians in Blow to DOJ |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 12 2023 |
What Does Affirmative Action’s Death Knell Mean for Employers? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 26 2013 |
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Preclusive Effect of Non-Delaware Dismissals and Rejects Irrebuttable Presumption That a Derivative Plaintiff Who Fails to Conduct a Section 220 Inspection Is an Inadequate Representative |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 20 2013 |
IRS, DOL and Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) Issue Post-DOMA Guidance Regarding Treatment of Same-Sex Spouses |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 4 2018 |
Ninth Circuit Determines That George Constanza Was Right!—In Limited Circumstances, Whales And Seals Are Fish (Not Mammals) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 7 2020 |
Death by a Thousand Cuts? Supreme Court Finds Government Debt Exception to TCPA Unconstitutional, Opening Door to Similar Attacks on FCC Regulations |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 16 2020 |
SCOTUS to Consider Whether California Unconstitutionally “Takes” Private Property When It Compels Employers to Grant Union Access to Private Property |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 19 2010 |
San Francisco Distinction Between Drugstores and Supermarkets Goes Up in Smoke |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 11 2014 |
A (Second) Lawsuit Seeks to Compel Statutory Timeframe For Administrative Law Judge Review of Medicare Claims Appeals |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 16 2023 |
Supreme Court Finds Bankruptcy Code Abrogates Tribal Sovereign Immunity |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 12 2011 |
State Policy Barring Development Seaward Of Most Landward Extension Of Historical Mean High Tide Line Invalid As Underground Regulation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 8 2013 |
Ninth Circuit Off-Label Marketing Decision Suggests More Prosecutions Will Be Coming |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 12 2013 |
Déjà Vu All Over Again: Ninth Circuit Rejects Yet Another Challenge To Rent Control, Including "Private Takings" Argument |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 21 2013 |
Employment Non-Discrimination Act Passes its First Test in the Senate |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 7 2014 |
Court Upholds New Jersey’s Ban on Unemployment Discrimination in Job Advertisements |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 17 2020 |
Texas v. California: SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments About the Constitutionality of the ACA |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 13 2023 |
Navigating Dual Purpose Communications After SCOTUS (Almost) Weighs in on Attorney-Client Privilege: 5 Practical Tips for Healthcare Attorneys |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 16 2023 |
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 16 2023 |
Supreme Court Weighs Whether to Clarify Camping Bans and Homelessness Policies |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 21 2014 |
Fourth Circuit Finds $24 Million False Claims Act Penalty Not Excessive Even Where No Damages Proven at Trial |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 12 2014 |
Sham Hatch-Waxman Infringement Suits And FDA Citizen Petitions; A Potential For New Liability For Innovators? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 24 2014 |
Ninth Circuit Rejects Use of Preemptive Litigation to Validate Federal Approvals |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 19 2023 |
Supreme Court Holds That Respondents in Agency Enforcement Actions May Raise Constitutional Challenges Outside of Administrative Proceedings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 21 2010 |
Supreme Court Says Florida's Beach Preservation Activities Did Not Infringe Shoreline Property Rights; Justices Scrap Over Role Of Courts In Property Takings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 12 2013 |
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Not Needed Before Starting Eminent Domain Proceeding |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 9 2013 |
Unusual Circumstances: California Supreme Court Upholds Limited Use of Future Conditions Baseline Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 5 2013 |
Proposed New York Law Would Extend State Anti-Discrimination Protections to Unpaid Interns |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 25 2015 |
California Supreme Court Upholds San Jose’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 18 2016 |
U.S. Supreme Court Remands Spokeo; Ninth Circuit Must Consider Whether “Concrete” Injury Occurred |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 28 2019 |
On Repeat: Courts Again Uphold Low Carbon Fuel Standard Programs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 19 2023 |
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on False Claims Act Scienter Standard |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 30 2010 |
Municipalities Beware: The Perils of Enacting Immigration Ordinances and Know What Your Insurance Policy Covers |
Poyner Spruill LLP |
Apr 30 2013 |
Pregnancy and Disability Discrimination the Focus of EEOC Enforcement Activity |
Poyner Spruill LLP |
Apr 30 2014 |
California Court Issues Important Decision Regarding Fitness for Duty Evaluations Following Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Leave |
Poyner Spruill LLP |
Aug 3 2010 |
President Obama Urges Congress to Pass the Paycheck Fairness Act |
Poyner Spruill LLP |
Feb 13 2014 |
Same Sex Marriages: Are You Filing Your Taxes Properly? |
Poyner Spruill LLP |
Jun 29 2015 |
Supreme Court Agrees With EEOC In Regard To Religious Accommodation |
Poyner Spruill LLP |
Dec 3 2010 |
EEOC Issues Final Regulations for the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 |
Poyner Spruill LLP |
Jan 25 2014 |
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Settlement Reminds Employers That Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) Prohibits Requesting Family Medical History |
Poyner Spruill LLP |
Jan 13 2014 |
Same-Gender Marriage Implications for Employee Benefit Plans |
Poyner Spruill LLP |