Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Date	Title	Organization
17 Sep	The Rest of the Story: Update on Puma 'Roar Mark' Trademark Dispute	Katten
17 Sep	A Trademark by Any Other Name: Why the UGG Brand Left Some Australians Saying “Ugh”	Norris McLaughlin P.A.
17 Sep	None of Us Saw Them Stop the PTA Giveaway	Finnegan
17 Sep	China’s National People’s Congress Releases Translation of the Amended Patent Law	Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
16 Sep	10-Year Anniversary of the AIA at the PTAB―Not Your Grandparents’ U.S. Patent Law	Finnegan
16 Sep	Second Circuit Puts the Focus on Search-Term Restrictions in 1-800 Contacts Decision	Katten
16 Sep	Federal Circuit: Contractual Arbitration Agreements Don’t Bind PTAB Institution Decisions	McDermott Will & Emery
16 Sep	Genus Claims: Foiled Again by Written Description	Mintz
16 Sep	Notice Under § 287 Means Knowledge of Infringement, Not Knowledge of Patent	McDermott Will & Emery
16 Sep	TTAB Judicial Appointments are Determined Constitutionally Sound	McDermott Will & Emery
16 Sep	Material Information Submitted to FDA but Withheld from PTO Gives Rise to Inequitable Conduct	McDermott Will & Emery
16 Sep	Sixth Circuit: It’s a Go on Plaintiff’s Claims Despite Arbitration Clause	McDermott Will & Emery
15 Sep	Ninth Circuit Denies Sherman Act Challenge To No-Poach Provision	Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
15 Sep	China’s Hainan Province Proposes 1 Million RMB Rewards for Reporting Intellectual Property Infringement	Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
15 Sep	Prosecution Pointers 286-294	Finnegan
14 Sep	Update: Federal Judge Rules That Only Natural Persons Can Be Inventors	Winstead
14 Sep	Bad Faith Prosecution Of Trade Secrets Theft May Lead To Attorney's Fee Award (Or Not)	Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
10 Sep	Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality Patent Prosecution Update: 2021 Q1 Prosecution Statistics	Finnegan
9 Sep	Federal Circuit Reiterates Requirement under § 287 that Alleged Infringers have Notice of Specific Alleged Infringement	Mintz
9 Sep	Federal Circuit Vaporizes Pre-Suit Damages	Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
9 Sep	The Delhi High Court Rules on The Scope of The Bolar Exception	Nishith Desai Associates
9 Sep	Bascom Cannot Save Your Claims if Your Own Patent Says You Used Known Technology	McDermott Will & Emery
9 Sep	Damage Expert Testimony Excluded for Failure to Disclose Evidence and to Apportion	McDermott Will & Emery
9 Sep	Another Genus Claim Bites the Dust for Lack of Written Description	McDermott Will & Emery
9 Sep	Update on Artificial Intelligence: Court Rules that AI Cannot Qualify As “Inventor”	Proskauer Rose LLP
9 Sep	Ownership of Inventions By Former Employers: Lessons after Bio-Rad v. ITC	Proskauer Rose LLP
9 Sep	3D Chess at the Federal Circuit: Can’t Walk Back Arguments in Prior Appeal or Prosecution History	McDermott Will & Emery
9 Sep	Foreign Company’s Purposeful US Activities Blemishes Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Defense	McDermott Will & Emery
8 Sep	Part II: The Current State of Precedential Opinions and Denials of Institution at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board – Advanced Bionics and Section 325(d) Discretionary Denials	Finnegan
7 Sep	Xiaoi Robot Seeks Preliminary Injunction Against Apple in Shanghai Patent Infringement Suit	Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
7 Sep	File It or Lose It	Finnegan
7 Sep	Sharing Motion Picture Materials: Practical Considerations	Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
7 Sep	Plaintiffs Beware – Disclose all Evidence of Lost Profits Damages During Discovery	Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
7 Sep	PTAB Challenges to Orange Book-Listed and Biologic Patents	Finnegan
7 Sep	Prosecution History Estoppel: Still Lurking for The Unwary	Summa PLLC
7 Sep	New York and Chicago-Style Pizza Wars: The Trademark Edition	Proskauer Rose LLP
5 Sep	China’s Supreme People’s Court Affirms Right to Set Royalty Rates Worldwide in OPPO/Sharp Standard Essential Patent Case	Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
4 Sep	Belcher v. Hospira – Inequitable Conduct is Still in Your Invalidity Toolbox	Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
3 Sep	Belmora Petitions for Supreme Court Review of FLANAX Decision	Norris McLaughlin P.A.
3 Sep	A Preamble Held Limiting Based on the Patentee’s Arguments in a Prior Appeal and File History	Finnegan
3 Sep	Federal Circuit: FOCUSVISION Confusingly Similar to FOCUS	Finnegan
3 Sep	Chinese Patent Bar Applicants Hits New High in 2021 – Over 50,000 People Applied to Take the Exam	Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
3 Sep	Teaching Away May Preclude Motivation to Modify a Reference	Finnegan
3 Sep	The Pandemic Isn’t Over, Nor is the USTPO’s Fast Track Program for COVID-Related Inventions	Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
2 Sep	Patent Owner Tip #17 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Alternatives to Motions to Amend in IPR Proceedings	Mintz
2 Sep	Federal Circuit Upholds Exclusion of Damages Expert Testimony	Finnegan
2 Sep	Unhappy Together: No Right of Public Performance under California Copyright Law	McDermott Will & Emery
2 Sep	Institution Denied for Failure to Prevail on Indefiniteness and/or Obviousness	Finnegan
2 Sep	Lanham Act Reaches Foreign Defendants’ Extraterritorial Conduct, but Worldwide Injunction Too Broad	McDermott Will & Emery
2 Sep	Footnote Doesn’t Preserve Claim Construction Argument, but Patent Owner Must Observe “nose of Wax” Principle	McDermott Will & Emery

September 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 260

September 17, 2021

September 16, 2021

September 15, 2021

September 14, 2021

Pages

Legal Disclaimer