Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Dec
7
2016
Supreme Court Holds Profit from Components of Infringing Product Can Be Appropriate Measure of Design Patent Damages Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
7
2016
UK Keyword Advertising – Novel Questions of Honest Concurrent Use and Passing Off Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
7
2016
Supreme Court Addresses Design Patent Damages for First Time in 120 Years: New Era of Design Patent Damages Dawn Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
7
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 7, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
7
2016
Oscar-Worthy Expert Disproves $7M In Damages IMS Legal Strategies
Dec
6
2016
Supreme Court Complicates Design Patent Damage Calculation – Apple v. Samsung Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
6
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 6, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
6
2016
PTAB Holds Oral Hearings In Tecfidera Patent IPR and Interference Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
6
2016
Online Service Providers – Important Update – Copyright Safe Harbor Vedder Price
Dec
5
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 5, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
5
2016
Going All the Way: Second Circuit Jury Awards $14.5 Million in Trade Secrets Lawsuit Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Dec
2
2016
US Supreme Court to Review Patent Exhaustion Doctrine McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
2
2016
Sunrise’s Infringement Complaint Gets the Green Light Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
2
2016
The Federal Circuit Confirms That It Will Review PTAB’s CBM Determinations … To A Certain Extent Mintz
Dec
2
2016
Copyright Office Rule Changes Require Website Owners to Take Action to Benefit From DMCA Safe Harbor Katten
Dec
2
2016
New Year, New Rules: What to Know About the January 2017 TTAB Rule Updates Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
2
2016
When Theory and Practice Diverge: Registering a Certification Mark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
2
2016
To Perform a Technical Function or Not: This is Rubik's Question K&L Gates
Dec
1
2016
Changes to the “But-For” Standard For Materiality at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office? Mintz
Dec
1
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 1, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
30
2016
Future and Unreleased Products Can’t Drive Patent Litigation Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
30
2016
DMCA Safe Harbor Protection Requires Action Under New Copyright Regulations Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Nov
30
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 30, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
30
2016
YouTube Ripping, A Copyright Wildfire IMS Legal Strategies
Nov
30
2016
Upcoming Changes to Italy’s Biosimilar Landscape Covington & Burling LLP
Nov
29
2016
Not All Repeat Infringer Policies Are Sufficient for Safe Harbor Protection McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
Federal Circuit Clarifies What Constitutes Use “In Commerce” Under the Lanham Act Mintz
Nov
29
2016
Termination of Distribution Agreement Does Not Affect Licenses to Cloud-Based Access McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
“Who’s on First?” Routine in Broadway Play Strikes Out as Transformative Fair Use Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Nov
29
2016
Eleventh Circuit Shoots Down Firearms Retailer’s Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
Update on Patentability of Diagnostic Claims: Canada Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
29
2016
Trademark Infringement: Amazon.com Does Not Have to Put Out the Fire McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
29
2016
Ninth Circuit Joins Octane Fitness Trend for Trademark Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2016
PTAB Reverses Obviousness Finding After Remand: Corning Optical Communications RF, LLC v. PPC Broadband, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins