Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jan
29
2013
Too Many Patents in US? We Only Rank 12th in Patents Per Capita Worldwide Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
2
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Top 10 Patent Reexamination Invalidation Cases of 2022 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
17
2013
Biotech’s Public Relations Problems Continue Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
19
2013
Federal Circuit Will Review Cybor Intellectual Property Decision En Banc Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
8
2019
USTPO Releases Proposed Revised Section 101 Eligibility Guidelines Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2013
Petitioner Allowed to Submit Supplemental Information After Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Trial and Appeal Board Trial Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
24
2013
Finally, A Reasonable Decision Re: Patent Software Decision Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
2
2013
Ultramercial v. Hulu – Judge Rader Clips the Wings of the “Abstract Idea” Exception to Software Invention Eligibility Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
17
2019
Is the “Blocking Patent” Doctrine Part of the Obviousness Analysis? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2019
Bipartisan “Draft Bill” to Amend ss. 100, 101 and 112 Released for Comment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
27
2023
4.5-Year Prison Sentence in Shanghai for Counterfeiting of Anchor Butter Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
23
2016
Ohio Willow Wood’s Appeal of IC Finding Goes Up In Smoke Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
12
2013
Teresa Stanek Rea Announces Her Departure From the Patent & Trademark Office Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
7
2013
Sanofi-Aventis v. Pfizer – Possession and Appreciation Trump Structure Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
12
2019
Genotyping Patent Claims Do Not Escape The Reach of s. 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2019
Federal Circuit Rules that PTAB Judges are Unconstitutionally Appointed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
30
2014
University Research In The Marketplace: Bayh-Dole Act Is A “Job Creator” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
12
2024
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Joins the Patent Prosecution Highway Improvement Initiative in Cooperation with the IP5 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
17
2024
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Revise Patent Certificates Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
2
2014
Supreme Court Granted Cert In Teva V. Sandoz (“April Fool” Lightning Ballast!) Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
16
2020
INO v. Praxair – Time for the Supreme Court to Step Up to the Plate? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2014
Eastern District of Virginia Decides PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) Decision to not institute IPR (Inter Partes Review) is Not Appealable Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2014
Federal Circuit Dismisses Appeals by Petitioners Who Were Denied Inter Partes Reviews Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
30
2020
Trademark Applicant & Chinese IP Agency Fined for Malicious Registration of Coronavirus Related Trademarks Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
5
2016
USPTO will “Fast Track” Cancer Immunotherapy Applications Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2020
Chinese Rail System for Restaurant Meal Delivery Patent Infringed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
16
2014
Gone Judge – Judge Randall Rader To Resign Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
27
2020
G S Cleantech Petitions Fed. Cir. for Rehearing En Banc Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
28
2020
China’s New Civil Code Includes Punitive Damages in Intentional Intellectual Property Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
27
2016
Hillary Believes In The Patent System Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
4
2020
China’s Black People’s Toothpaste (Darlie) to be Renamed HYMULA? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
12
2020
China Punishes Another Trademark Agency for Malicious Registration of Coronavirus-Related Trademarks Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
25
2020
China Releases Q3 2020 Patent Application Filing Data Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
11
2014
FDA Publishes “Purple Book” for Biologicals/Biosimilars Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
6
2017
Are Patent-Friendly PTAB Decisions On the Rise? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins