Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Dec
29
2020
China’s National People’s Congress Passes Amended Criminal Law Adding an Economic Espionage Article and Increasing Prison Time for Intellectual Property Crimes Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
21
2021
Burberry Wins Preliminary Injunction Against Baneberry at Suzhou, China’s Intermediate People’s Court for Trademark Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
8
2014
Commil USA v. Cisco Systems – Induced Infringement In For Clarification Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
28
2021
Wyeth’s 30.55 Million RMB Punitive Damages Award for Chinese Trademark Infringement Upheld on Appeal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
5
2021
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Top 10 Cases of Administrative Trademark Adjudication Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
3
2017
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Mexichem Amanco Holdings – Revenge of the Chemist Judges II Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
26
2021
China’s President Xi Jinping Throws His Support Behind an Intellectual Property Rights Waiver for COVID Vaccines Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
20
2015
Promega v. Life Technologies – “Too Much Of Nothing?” re: Patent Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
2
2021
China’s National Copyright Administration Releases Top Ten Criminal Infringement and Piracy Cases of 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
21
2017
Amazon 1-Click Patent About to Expire Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
7
2021
L’Occitane’s 9 Million RMB Award for Trademark Infringement in China Affirmed on Appeal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
8
2021
China Releases Draft Patent Examination Guidelines for Comment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
20
2021
District in Guangzhou, China Proposes 2.5 Million RMB Housing Subsidy to Attract Intellectual Property Professionals Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
10
2021
Shanghai, China’s Municipal People’s Congress Proposes Fining Irregular Patent Application Applicants Up To 150,000 RMB Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
4
2011
Microsoft V. i4i – Prosecution And The “Variable Proof Regime” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
28
2015
“Isolated” Natural Products Still in Purgatory Post-PTO Guidance? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
14
2021
What’s Important Now in Intellectual Property? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
21
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases 14th Five-Year Plan for Patent and Trademark Examination Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
17
2015
Federal Circuit Interprets Board’s Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard – Part I Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
20
2022
Chinese Utility Model Grants Up 29.5% in Q1 2022 YoY Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
27
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Rules in First Batch of Patent Linkage Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
4
2015
Professor Eisenberg Analyzes the 101 Exception for Patents Claiming Diagnostic Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
11
2012
PTO Guidelines for Process Claims Involving Laws of Nature Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
14
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court: Incorrect PCT Applicant Has Good Faith Duty to Actual Rightsholder Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
16
2015
PTO Announces Requirements for Expedited Appeals for Small Entities Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
2
2022
Chinese Trademark Office Cracks Down on World Cup Trademark Squatting Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
27
2012
USPTO Director Kappos Resigns Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
8
2023
CNIPA Releases Interim Measures for Handling Examination Business Related to the Implementation of the Revised Patent Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
19
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court & Supreme People’s Procuratorate Release Draft Interpretation of Handling Criminal Cases of Intellectual Property Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
25
2018
Ex parte Galloway – Two Correlations are Better than One Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
23
2018
Interval Licensing v. AOL — Judge Plager’s Concurring Dissent Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
23
2013
Limiting Functional Claiming for Software Patents: A Solution or an Impossibility? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
9
2018
Ex Parte Young – Expanding the Scope of an “Abstract Idea.” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
4
2013
Annual Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) Conference Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
20
2018
Ex Parte Schwartz – A Pyrric Reversal of a 101 Rejection Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins